Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30916645›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Drawing and the dynamic nature of living systems.

Gemma Anderson, John Dupré, James G Wakefield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gemma AndersonLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6678-5109
James G WakefieldLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3616-2346

Funding

Arts and Humanities Research Council AH/P007457/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representing the dynamic nature of biological processes is a challenge. This article describes a collaborative project in which the authors - a philosopher of biology, an artist and a cell biologist - explore how best to represent the entire process of cell division in one connected image. This involved a series of group Drawing Labs, one-to-one sessions, and discussions between the authors. The drawings generated during the collaboration were then reviewed by four experts in cell division. We propose that such an approach has value, both in communicating the dynamic nature of biological processes and in generating new insights and hypotheses that can be tested by artists and scientists.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionMedical IllustrationHumansIntersectoral CollaborationArtcell biologycell divisionmicrotubulemitosisphilosophyPhilosophy of biology

Identifiers

PMID30916645
PMCPMC6436894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.