Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30916450›Full record

Trial reportBrain and behavior2019

Brain structural changes after multi-strategic metamemory training in older adults with subjective memory complaints: A randomized controlled trial.

Jung-Hae Youn, Seung-Ho Ryu, Jun-Young Lee, Soowon Park, Seong-Jin Cho, Hunki Kwon, Jin-Ju Yang, Jong-Min Lee, Jiyeon Lee, Seolmin Kim and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Subjective cognitive decline: Memory complaints, cognitive awareness, and metacognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jung-Hae YounGraduate School of Clinical Counseling Psychology, CHA University, Pocheon, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Ho RyuDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Young LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University & SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soowon ParkDepartment of Education, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Jin ChoGachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Hunki KwonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Ju YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Min LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiyeon LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University & SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seolmin KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Dong Hyun YoonDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University & SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3997-2670
Seoul National University · KRHanyang University · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRKorea Counseling Graduate University · KRSejong University · KRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetamemory is the process of monitoring and controlling one's memory. Improving metamemory may reduce the memory problem in old age. We hypothesized that metamemory training (MMT) would improve cognition in older adults with subjective memory complaints and change the brain region related to metacognition.

methodWe recruited and randomized older adults to the multi-strategic memory training of 10 weekly 90-min sessions, based on the metamemory concept or usual care. Cognitive tests including the Elderly Verbal Learning Test, Simple Rey Figure Test, Digit Span, Spatial Span, Categorical Fluency, and the Boston Naming Test were done in 201 participants, together with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 49 participants before and after training.

resultsA total of 112 in the training group and 89 in the control group participated. The training group had a significant increase in long-term delayed free recall, categorical fluency, and the Boston Naming test. In MRI, the mean diffusivity of the bundles of axon tracts passing from the frontal lobe to the posterior end of the lateral sulcus decreased in the training group.

conclusionThese results indicate that the MMT program has a positive impact on enhancing older people' cognitive performance. Improved white matter integrity in the anterior and posterior cerebrum and increased cortical thickness of prefrontal regions, which related to metacognition, possibly suggest that the effects of the MMT would be induced via the enhancement of cognitive control.

Indexed as

Memory DisordersAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCognitionDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMetacognitionbrain structurecognitive functionmetamemorytraining

Identifiers

PMID30916450
PMCPMC6520300
OpenAlexW2924193630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.