Opioid stewardship: a need for opioid discharge guidance. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2019; 122: e198-e208.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. What is "Opioid Stewardship"? An Overview of Current Definitions and Proposal for a Universally Acceptable Definition.Journal of pain research · 2023
   Review
2. Patient-centered Opioid Prescribing: Breaking Away From One-Size-Fits-All Prescribing Guidelines.The Journal of surgical research · 2021
   Article
3. Recommendations for Managing Opioid-Tolerant Surgical Patients within Enhanced Recovery Pathways.Current pain and headache reports · 2020
   Review
4. Post-surgical pain management: time for a paradigm shift.British journal of anaesthesia · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The prescription opioid crisis: role of the anaesthesiologist in reducing opioid use and misuse.2019

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as