Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30915996›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2019

Assessing pain in the postoperative period: Analgesia Nociception Index

David Charier, Marie-Charlotte Vogler, Daniel Zantour, Vincent Pichot, Alexandre Martins-Baltar, Marjolaine Courbon, Frédéric Roche, François Vassal, Serge Molliex

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03267979 (Assessing Pain in the Postoperative Period by Automatically Measuring the Variation Coefficient of Pupillary Diameter), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03267979 nacompletednot on this map

Assessing Pain in the Postoperative Period by Automatically Measuring the Variation Coefficient of Pupillary Diameter: PREVANS Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneRan2014 to 2015Enrolled345ConditionsAnesthesia, GeneralArmsVideo-pupillometer, Electrocardiogram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David CharierDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France; Research Team EA 4607, SNA-EPIS, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France. Electronic address: david.charier@chu-st-etienne.fr.
Marie-Charlotte VoglerDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France.
Daniel ZantourDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France.
Vincent PichotClinical Physiology and Exercise Department, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France; Research Team EA 4607, SNA-EPIS, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Alexandre Martins-BaltarJacques Lisfranc Faculty of Medicine, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Marjolaine CourbonJacques Lisfranc Faculty of Medicine, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Frédéric RocheClinical Physiology and Exercise Department, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France; Research Team EA 4607, SNA-EPIS, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
François VassalNeurosurgery, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France; INSERM U1028, Central Integration of Pain Lab, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Serge MolliexDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France; Research Team EA 4607, SNA-EPIS, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRUniversité Jean Monnet · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPotential methods for objective assessment of postoperative pain include the Analgesia Nociception Index™ (ANI), a real-time index of the parasympathetic tone, the pupillary light reflex (PLR), and the variation coefficient of pupillary diameter (VCPD), a measure of pupillary diameter (PD) fluctuations. Until now, the literature is divided as to their respective accuracy magnitudes for assessing a patient's pain. The VCPD has been demonstrated to strongly correlate with pain in an obstetrical population. However, the pain induced by obstetrical labour is different, given its intermittent nature, than the pain observed during the postoperative period. The aim of the current study was to compare the respective values of these variables at VAS scores ≥4.

methodsAfter approval by the Ethics Committee, 345 patients aged on average 50 (SD 17) yr (range: 18-91 yr) of age were included. The protocols of general anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia were left to the anaesthetist's discretion. Some 40 min after tracheal intubation, VAS, ANI, PD, PLR, and VCPD values were recorded.

resultsVCPD correlates more strongly (r=0.78) with pain as assessed with the VAS than ANI (r=-0.15). PD and PLR are not statistically correlated with VAS. The ability of VCPD to assess the pain of patients (VAS≥4) is strong [area under the curve (AUC): 0.92, confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95], and better than for ANI (AUC: 0.39, CI: 0.33-0.45).

conclusionsOur study suggests that VCPD could be a useful tool for monitoring pain in conscious patients during the postoperative period. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03267979.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesiaBlood PressureFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedNociceptionPain MeasurementPostoperative PainReflex, PupillaryYoung Adultautonomic tonenociceptionpainpupillary diametervariation coefficient of pupillary diameter

Identifiers

PMID30915996
PMCPMC6676014
OpenAlexW2912282235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.