ArticleHeart and vessels2019
Neo-aortic insufficiency late after staged reconstruction for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: impact of differences in initial palliative procedures.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral pulmonary artery banding facilitates the systemic ventricular outflow tract growth for biventricular and univentricular repair candidates of complex arch anomaly.Heart and vessels · 2024Article
- The neo-aortic valve in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome is largely preserved: a serial follow-up CMR study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Fontan candidacy, optimizing Fontan circulation, and beyond.JTCVS open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neo-aortic insufficiency in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome is an important sequela. We assessed the risks of the neo-aortic valve deterioration by the difference of initial palliations: Group I underwent primary Norwood (Nw) with systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt (SPS), Group II underwent bilateral pulmonary artery banding (bPAB) and subsequent Nw with SPS (bPAB-Nw/SPS), Group III underwent bPAB and subsequent Nw with bidirectional Glenn (BDG) procedure (bPAB-Nw/BDG). The neo-aortic valve z score changes over time did not reach statistical significance in all groups (p = 0.43 for Group I, 0.20 for Group II, and 0.30 for Group III). The degree of neo-aortic valve insufficiency did not change significantly over time during this period except for Group III (p = 0.34 for Group I, 0.20 for Group II, and 0.02 for Group III). On the other hand, dimensions of the neo-aortic annulus and degrees of neo-aortic insufficiency did not differ significantly among the 3 groups at any pre-determined time. The presence or absence of incision into the sino-tubular junction at Nw did not affect the late neo-aortic valve z score or insufficiency. These data indicate that the difference of initial palliative procedures does not affect late neo-aortic valve insufficiency in Nw survivors. Because valve failure may develop in longer follow-up, further observation should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.