Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30915518›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2019

How Hosts Taxonomy, Trophy, and Endosymbionts Shape Microbiome Diversity in Beetles.

Michał Kolasa, Radosław Ścibior, Miłosz A Mazur, Daniel Kubisz, Katarzyna Dudek, Łukasz Kajtoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michał KolasaInstitute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland. michal.r.kolasa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2143-429X
Radosław ŚcibiorDepartment of Zoology and Animal Ecology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Miłosz A MazurInstitute of Biology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Daniel KubiszInstitute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna DudekMolecular and Behavioral Ecology Group, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Łukasz KajtochInstitute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland DEC-2013/11/D/NZ8/00583Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education small grants for young researchers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial communities play a crucial role in the biology, ecology, and evolution of multicellular organisms. In this research, the microbiome of 24 selected beetle species representing five families (Carabidae, Staphylinidae, Curculionidae, Chrysomelidae, Scarabaeidae) and three trophic guilds (carnivorous, herbivorous, detrivorous) was examined using 16S rDNA sequencing on the Illumina platform. The aim of the study was to compare diversity within and among species on various levels of organization, including evaluation of the impact of endosymbiotic bacteria. Collected data showed that beetles possess various bacterial communities and that microbiota of individuals of particular species hosts are intermixed. The most diverse microbiota were found in Carabidae and Scarabaeidae; the least diverse, in Staphylinidae. On higher organization levels, the diversity of bacteria was more dissimilar between families, while the most distinct with respect to their microbiomes were trophic guilds. Moreover, eight taxa of endosymbiotic bacteria were detected including common genera such as Wolbachia, Rickettsia, and Spiroplasma, as well as the rarely detected Cardinium, Arsenophonus, Buchnera, Sulcia, Regiella, and Serratia. There were no correlations among the abundance of the most common Wolbachia and Rickettsia; a finding that does not support the hypothesis that these bacteria occur interchangeably. The abundance of endosymbionts only weakly and negatively correlates with diversity of the whole microbiome in beetles. Overall, microbiome diversity was found to be more dependent on host phylogeny than on the abundance of endosymbionts. This is the first study in which bacteria diversity is compared between numerous species of beetles in a standardized manner.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaColeopteraFeeding BehaviorMicrobiotaPhylogenyBacterial communityColeopteraEndosymbiontsHost–microbe interactionsMicrobial ecology

Identifiers

PMID30915518
PMCPMC6842344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.