Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30915435›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Nutrition and Cancer Prevention: Why is the Evidence Lost in Translation?

Katie M Di Sebastiano, Gayathri Murthy, Kristin L Campbell, Sophie Desroches, Rachel A Murphy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Role of Fruit-Derived Antioxidants in Fighting Cancer: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Feasibility of a Cancer Awareness Program for High School Students in a Brazilian School: A Pilot Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sensory perceptions of survivors of cancer and their caregivers upon blinded evaluation of produce from two different sources.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie M Di SebastianoSchool of Population and Public Health.
Gayathri MurthySchool of Population and Public Health.
Kristin L CampbellDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sophie DesrochesSchool of Nutrition, Université Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Rachel A MurphySchool of Population and Public Health.
Université Laval · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the high burden of cancer worldwide, primary prevention has been identified as a key cancer control strategy to reduce this burden. Diet and nutrition are important modifiable factors that may alter the risk of developing cancer, because several dietary components including alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable intake, and dietary fiber have been shown to significantly impact cancer risk. Consequently, a number of organizations have developed cancer prevention guidelines that highlight the importance of nutrition (and related factors including body size and physical activity) to reduce the risk of cancer. However, there are barriers to the uptake of these guidelines, particularly with respect to diet and nutrition including awareness, communication, and other factors that influence eating behavior. Improved knowledge translation (KT) of recommendations may help facilitate uptake. The purposes of this narrative review are: 1) to examine issues and challenges related to KT of diet and nutrition evidence in the context of cancer prevention, including public awareness and attitudes towards cancer prevention, engagement in cancer prevention strategies, and effects of KT on diet-cancer preventive behaviors; 2) to discuss examples of effective and ineffective KT of diet and nutrition evidence; and 3) to provide recommendations for improving KT to help move the field of diet, nutrition, and cancer prevention forward. Evidence shows that adherence to nutrition recommendations for cancer prevention significantly reduces the risk of cancer; however, engagement in nutrition-based preventative behaviors is low. Skepticism and confusion around evidence linking diet and nutrition with cancer may arise, in part, through ineffective media KT; the primary source of health information for many people. Simple, tailored, targeted KT communication strategies aimed at increasing the general public's awareness, attitudes, and engagement in cancer preventive behavior should be emphasized to encourage cancer control.

Indexed as

DietHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansNeoplasmsNutritional SciencesPrimary PreventionTranslational Research, Biomedicalbody sizecancer riskdietknowledge translationobesityphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID30915435
PMCPMC6520044
OpenAlexW2923238065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.