Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30915424›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Belgian Society of Radiology2018

Imaging of Malignant Primitive Tumors of the Spine.

Meriem Mechri, Hend Riahi, Imed Sboui, Mouna Bouaziz, Filip Vanhoenacker, Mohamed Ladeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Primary malignant bone tumours-part II].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Coccygodynia—Diagnosis and Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Treatment options for coccygodynia].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meriem MechriInstitut Kassab of Orthopaedics, TN.
Hend RiahiInstitut Kassab of Orthopaedics, TN.
Imed SbouiInstitut Kassab of Orthopaedics, TN.
Mouna BouazizInstitut Kassab of Orthopaedics, TN.
Filip VanhoenackerAZ Sint-Maarten, Mechelen and University (Hospital) Antwerp/Ghent, BE.
Mohamed LadebInstitut Kassab of Orthopaedics, TN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary malignant tumors of the spine are rare and mainly include chordoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor, and osteosarcoma. The final diagnosis is based on the combination of patient age, topographic and histologic features of the tumor, and lesion pattern on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Imaging evaluation includes radiography, CT, bone scintigraphy, and MR imaging. CT is more useful than radiography for evaluating location of the lesion and analyzing bone destruction and matrix, whereas MR has unmatched ability to assess soft tissue extension. This pictorial review provides an overview of the most prevalent primitive malignant tumors of spine.

Indexed as

bone tumorsCTMRIradiographspine

Identifiers

PMID30915424
PMCPMC6425224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.