Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30915160›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2019

Papillary breast lesions diagnosed by percutaneous needle biopsy: management approach.

Jorge Andrés Pérez Fuentes, Carmen Elena Marín Martínez, Ana Karina Ramírez Casadiego, Víctor Francisco Acosta Freites, Víctor Arturo Acosta Marín, Ariana Cecilia Ruiz Castellano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge Andrés Pérez FuentesCentro Clínico de Estereotáxia-Ceclines, Caracas 1050, Venezuela.
Carmen Elena Marín MartínezCentro Clínico de Estereotáxia-Ceclines, Caracas 1050, Venezuela.
Ana Karina Ramírez CasadiegoCentro Clínico de Estereotáxia-Ceclines, Caracas 1050, Venezuela.
Víctor Francisco Acosta FreitesCentro Clínico de Estereotáxia-Ceclines, Caracas 1050, Venezuela.
Víctor Arturo Acosta MarínCentro Clínico de Estereotáxia-Ceclines, Caracas 1050, Venezuela.
Ariana Cecilia Ruiz CastellanoCentro Clínico de Estereotáxia-Ceclines, Caracas 1050, Venezuela.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papillary breast lesions are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms of diverse imagenological, clinical and morphological presentation that display different behaviour, prognosis and, therefore, controversial diagnosis and management. The aim of this study is to propose an algorithm for the management of mammary lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe show a retrospective review of breast imaging reporting, percutaneous needle biopsy information, histological-pathological reports and subsequent management.

resultsA total of 7,920 biopsies were reviewed. Only 136 biopsies from 130 patients with papillary lesions met the inclusion criteria. There was a correlation between the pathologic findings from percutaneous biopsy and the final surgical histologic result in patients with surgery recommendation in all but 2 (2.12%) cases in which the surgery results were upgraded to a malignant disease.

conclusionsThe algorithm proposed in this paper for the management of mammary lesions significantly reduces the possibilities of upgrading and favours decision making between follow-ups or surgery in patients with papillary lesions of the breast.

Indexed as

breastbreast biopsybreast papilloma managementcore needle biopsypapillary carcinomapapillomapercutaneous breast biopsypercutaneous core-needle biopsyupgradevacuum-assisted breast biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30915160
PMCPMC6390833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.