ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019
Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) and Fe Deficiency Responses in Dicot Plants.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed, 260 citations in OpenAlex.
- The core taxa connectivity in leaf microbiomes in ash trees stands is modulated by host-related and environmental factors.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Differences in Valsa Canker Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms Among Various Apple Rootstock-Scion Combinations.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic insights into the biocontrol mechanism of Trichoderma spp. against Fusarium wilt in melon.Stress biology · 2026Article
- Special Issue: "Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The fungal volatile organic compound 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone primes dwarf bean for enhanced drought tolerance.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Quantification and Determination of Compatible Bacterial Consortia.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Shaping Plant Growth Beneath the Soil: A Theoretical Exploration of Fungal Endophyte's Role as Plant Growth-Promoting Agents.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Review
- Microbial Metabolites: A Sustainable Approach to Combat Plant Pests.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Identification, Detection, and Management of Soft Rot Disease of Ginger in the Eastern Himalayan Region of India.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of the Biological Control of Pine Wilt Disease Using Microorganisms.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Unlocking Rhizosphere Dynamics: Exploring Mechanisms of Plant-Microbe Interactions for Enhanced Tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) Productivity.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Influence of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) Inoculation on Phenolic Content and Key Biosynthesis-Related Processes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in barley: induction of oxidative stress, hormonal imbalance, and systemic resistances.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Role of Methyl thiobutyrate toFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Soil microbial load modulation improves plant-microbe interactions and bioinoculant efficacy in pathogen-stressed soils.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Transcriptome Analysis of Chinese Cabbage Infected with Plasmodiophora Brassicae in the Primary Stage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants develop responses to abiotic stresses, like Fe deficiency. Similarly, plants also develop responses to cope with biotic stresses provoked by biological agents, like pathogens and insects. Some of these responses are limited to the infested damaged organ, but other responses systemically spread far from the infested organ and affect the whole plant. These latter responses include the Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) and the Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR). SAR is induced by pathogens and insects while ISR is mediated by beneficial microbes living in the rhizosphere, like bacteria and fungi. These root-associated mutualistic microbes, besides impacting on plant nutrition and growth, can further boost plant defenses, rendering the entire plant more resistant to pathogens and pests. In the last years, it has been found that ISR-eliciting microbes can induce both physiological and morphological responses to Fe deficiency in dicot plants. These results suggest that the regulation of both ISR and Fe deficiency responses overlap, at least partially. Indeed, several hormones and signaling molecules, like ethylene (ET), auxin, and nitric oxide (NO), and the transcription factor MYB72, emerged as key regulators of both processes. This convergence between ISR and Fe deficiency responses opens the way to the use of ISR-eliciting microbes as Fe biofertilizers as well as biopesticides. This review summarizes the progress in the understanding of the molecular overlap in the regulation of ISR and Fe deficiency responses in dicot plants. Root-associated mutualistic microbes, rhizobacteria and rhizofungi species, known for their ability to induce morphological and/or physiological responses to Fe deficiency in dicot plant species are also reviewed herein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.