Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30915082›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2019

Diagnostic Utility of Separate Anti-Ro60 and Anti-Ro52/TRIM21 Antibody Detection in Autoimmune Diseases.

Ailsa Robbins, Maxime Hentzien, Segolene Toquet, Kevin Didier, Amelie Servettaz, Bach-Nga Pham, Delphine Giusti

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ailsa RobbinsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Immunology, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims University Hospitals, Reims, France.
Maxime HentzienDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Immunology, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims University Hospitals, Reims, France.
Segolene ToquetDepartment of Internal Medicine, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims University Hospitals, Reims, France.
Kevin DidierDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Immunology, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims University Hospitals, Reims, France.
Amelie ServettazDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Immunology, Robert Debré Hospital, Reims University Hospitals, Reims, France.
Bach-Nga PhamLaboratory of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Delphine GiustiLaboratory of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-SS-A antibodies are often sought for in autoimmune diseases diagnosis. Two different target proteins have actually been identified: Ro52 and Ro60. Clinical and immunological associations seem different depending on anti-Ro52 or anti-Ro60 antibodies presence. However, due to a heterogeneous presentation in the literature, some immunology laboratories in France have stopped providing anti-Ro52 antibody findings. We report here a new hospital study designed to determine the diagnostic utility of the separate detection of anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 antibodies. We conducted a retrospective, observational study, including every adult patient with positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) tested in our immunology laboratory, and associated with anti-Ro52 and/or anti-Ro60 antibodies, between 2011 and 2014. Out of 13032 sera tested for ANA, 399 adults had antibodies to Ro52 and/or Ro60; 81.7% were female, with a mean age of 54.5 ± 17.0 years. Anti-Ro52 antibodies were found in 75.7% of the patients and anti-Ro60 antibodies in 56.9%. Among them, 43.1% were classified in the Ro52 + Ro60- group, 32.6% in the Ro52 + Ro60 + group and 24.3% in the Ro52-Ro60+ group. In the Ro52-Ro60+ group, systemic lupus was the most frequent diagnosis (48.5%), with a possible association with antiphospholipid antibodies (anti-cardiolipin antibodies: OR 2.5 (CI95 [1.0-5.0],

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAutoantigensAutoimmune DiseasesFemaleFranceHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedMyositisRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, Antiphospholipidanti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodiesAutoantigensRibonucleoproteinsRNA, Small CytoplasmicRO60 protein, humanSS-A antibodiesSS-A Antigenanti-Ro52 antibodiesanti-Ro60 antibodiesanti-SSA antibodiesautoimmune diseasesconnective tissue diseaseprimary Sjögren's syndromesystemic lupusTRIM21

Identifiers

PMID30915082
PMCPMC6423153
OpenAlexW2920829533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.