ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Culture-Sex Interaction and the Self-Report Empathy in Australians and Mainland Chinese.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- It's what's inside that counts: how dark triad traits mediate gender differences in prosocial behavior.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Cultural differences in self-reported empathy in Indonesia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Empathy Using the Vocals of Mental Health Helpline Counselors: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Unveiling empathy determinants across borders: a comparative analysis of medical students from two geo-sociocultural backgrounds.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Culture, sex and social context influence brain-to-brain synchrony: an fNIRS hyperscanning study.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Empathy in undergraduate medical students: a multi-center cross-sectional study in China.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- The cost of "snubbing": the effect of parental phubbing on filial piety behavior in children and adolescents.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Culture and gender modulate dlPFC integration in the emotional brain: evidence from dynamic causal modeling.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- How empathy, perceived parental care, and overprotection indexes are affected by participants' sex: investigating cultural differences.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The validation of a Mandarin version of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ-Chinese) in Chinese samples.PloS one · 2023Article
- Editorial: Mental health promotion and suicide prevention in a changing world.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- The ageing of the social mind: replicating the preservation of socio-affective and the decline of socio-cognitive processes in old age.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Culture, Sex, and Group-Bias in Trait and State Empathy.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Theories of the Development of Students: A Factor to Shape Teacher Empathy From the Perspective of Motivation.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The Moderating Role of Empathy Profiles in the Relationship Between Knowledge About Aging and Attitudes Toward Older Adults Among Nursing Students.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Cross-Cultural Differences and Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Actions and Feelings Questionnaire (J-AFQ).Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Impact Factors of Empathy in Mainland Chinese Youth.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on psychological wellbeing.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empathy is the ability to understand and share other people's emotions. Researchers have debated whether Westerners and Asians differ in their self-report empathy. This study aimed to replicate a previously reported culture-sex interaction in self-report empathy using Australian and Mainland Chinese participants, to investigate the cultural differences in self-report empathy in each sex group, and to verify the moderated mediating effects of three empathy-related traits (i.e., independent self-construal, interdependent self-construal, and personal distress) on the cultural differences in self-report empathy in both sex groups. In this study, scores on two self-report questionnaires of empathy, namely, the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), were compared between 196 Australian Caucasian (101 males) and 211 Mainland Chinese (59 males) university students. Results first confirmed the significant culture-sex interaction and illustrated that the cultural differences in empathy scores were significant only for female (i.e., Australian females had higher scores than Mainland Chinese females) but not for male participants. Furthermore, results of moderated mediation analyses indicated that higher self-report empathy in both females and males was related to higher interdependent self-construal (exhibited by Mainland Chinese) and less personal distress (exhibited by Australians), and particularly in females, also related to higher independent self-construal (exhibited by Australian females). The current study is one of few studies that suggest cultural differences in empathy are dependent on the sex of the participant. Moreover, the current findings have added new insights into the explanation of cultural differences in empathy using personal distress and self-construal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.