Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30914915›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), Leaves Virtual Navigation Performance Unchanged.

Roberta Ferrucci, Silvia Serino, Fabiana Ruggiero, Claudia Repetto, Desirée Colombo, Elisa Pedroli, Sara Marceglia, Giuseppe Riva, Alberto Priori

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Monitoring Brain Activity in VR: EEG and Neuroimaging.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberta FerrucciAldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, International Medical School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Silvia SerinoDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Fabiana RuggieroNeurophysiology Unit, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Claudia RepettoDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Desirée ColomboDepartment of Basic Psychology, Clinic and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Elisa PedroliIRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab, Milan, Italy.
Sara MarcegliaNeurophysiology Unit, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe RivaDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Alberto PrioriAldo Ravelli Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, International Medical School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e CarloFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversitat Jaume I · ESUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial cognition is an umbrella term used to refer to the complex set of abilities necessary to encode, categorize, and use spatial information from the surrounding environment to move effectively and orient within it. Experimental studies indicate that the cerebellum belongs to the neural network involved in spatial cognition, although its exact role in this function remains unclear. Our aim was to investigate in a pilot study using a virtual reality navigation task in healthy subjects whether cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive technique, influences spatial navigation. Forty healthy volunteers (24 women; age range = 20-42 years; years of education range 13-18) were recruited. The virtual reality spatial navigation task comprised two phases: encoding, in which participants actively navigated the environment and learned the spatial locations for one object, and retrieval, in which they retrieved the position of the object they had discovered and memorized in the previous encoding phase, starting from another starting point. Participants received tDCS stimulation (anodal or sham according to the experimental condition they were assigned to) for 20 min before beginning the retrieval phase. Our results showed that cerebellar tDCS left the accuracy of the three indexes used to measure effective navigational abilities unchanged. Hence, cerebellar tDCS had no influence on the retrieval phase for the spatial maps stored. Further studies, enrolling a larger sample and testing a different stimulation protocol, may give a greater insight into the role of the cerebellum in spatial navigation.

Indexed as

allocentriccerebellar tDCScerebellumegocentricspatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID30914915
PMCPMC6422954
OpenAlexW2921216214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.