Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30914882›Full record

ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2018

A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach's Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers.

Mohamad Adam Bujang, Evi Diana Omar, Nur Akmal Baharum

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06431724 (A Prospective Analysis of Adherence to National Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations in Women Age >65), which is not on this map. Cited by 216 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
216citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06431724 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Analysis of Adherence to National Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations in Women Age >65

TypeobservationalSponsorSarasota Memorial Health Care SystemRan2023 to 2024Enrolled300ConditionsCervical CancerArmsPatient Survey, Provider Survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

216 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and Validation of AI Help-Seeking Behavior Scale Among Undergraduate University Students.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Thai Translation and Validation of Chronic Rhinosinusitis-Patient Reported Outcome (CRS-PRO).World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

156 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamad Adam BujangClinical Research Centre, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Evi Diana OmarClinical Research Centre, Serdang Hospital, Ministry of Health, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nur Akmal BaharumNational Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliability studies are commonly used in questionnaire development studies and questionnaire validation studies. This study reviews the sample size guideline for Cronbach's alpha test.

methodsManual sample size calculation using Microsoft Excel software and sample size tables were tabulated based on a single coefficient alpha and the comparison of two coefficients alpha.

resultsFor a single coefficient alpha test, the approach by assuming the Cronbach's alpha coefficient equals to zero in the null hypothesis will yield a smaller sample size of less than 30 to achieve a minimum desired effect size of 0.7. However, setting the coefficient of Cronbach's alpha larger than zero in the null hypothesis could be necessary and this will yield larger sample size. For comparison of two coefficients of Cronbach's alpha, a larger sample size is needed when testing for smaller effect sizes.

conclusionsIn the assessment of the internal consistency of an instrument, the present study proposed the Cronbach's alpha's coefficient to be set at 0.5 in the null hypothesis and hence larger sample size is needed. For comparison of two coefficients' of Cronbach's alpha, justification is needed whether testing for extremely low and extremely large effect sizes are scientifically necessary.

Indexed as

Cronbach’s alphainternal consistencyreliabilitysample size

Identifiers

PMID30914882
PMCPMC6422571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.