Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30914854›Full record

ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2018

Sample Size Guidelines for Logistic Regression from Observational Studies with Large Population: Emphasis on the Accuracy Between Statistics and Parameters Based on Real Life Clinical Data.

Mohamad Adam Bujang, Nadiah Sa'at, Tg Mohd Ikhwan Tg Abu Bakar Sidik, Lim Chien Joo

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 293 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
293citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05133648 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Association of Anesthesia Technique With Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 and Surgery for Hip Fracture: a Retrospective Population Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled1,000ConditionsHip Fractures, COVID-19, General Anesthesia, Spinal AnesthesiaArmsHip Fracture Surgery, COVID-19 infection
NCT05518643 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Enhanced Recovery Program, Patient Reported Outcomes, Surgery-specific Outcomes and Stress Response After Pancreatic Surgery: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study by the Thessalic Pancreas Study Group (ThePANas).

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of ThessalyRan2022 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsERAS, Pancreas Cancer, Pancreas, FistulaArmsERAS protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

293 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

233 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamad Adam BujangClinical Research Centre, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia.
Nadiah Sa'atBiostatistics Unit, National Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Tg Mohd Ikhwan Tg Abu Bakar SidikBiostatistics Unit, National Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lim Chien JooClinical Research Centre, Sarawak General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kuching, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent study designs and population size may require different sample size for logistic regression. This study aims to propose sample size guidelines for logistic regression based on observational studies with large population.

methodsWe estimated the minimum sample size required based on evaluation from real clinical data to evaluate the accuracy between statistics derived and the actual parameters. Nagelkerke r-squared and coefficients derived were compared with their respective parameters.

resultsWith a minimum sample size of 500, results showed that the differences between the sample estimates and the population was sufficiently small. Based on an audit from a medium size of population, the differences were within ± 0.5 for coefficients and ± 0.02 for Nagelkerke

conclusionsFor observational studies with large population size that involve logistic regression in the analysis, taking a minimum sample size of 500 is necessary to derive the statistics that represent the parameters. The other recommended rules of thumb are EPV of 50 and formula;

Indexed as

logistic regressionobservational studiessample size

Identifiers

PMID30914854
PMCPMC6422534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.