ArticleScientific reports2019
Causal relationship between local field potential and intrinsic optical signal in epileptiform activity in vitro.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual and Sex Differences in Behavior and Cortical Excitability in the Rat Valproate Model of Autism.Cells · 2026Article
- Model-free detection of unique events in time series.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The directed causal relationship were examined between the local field potential (LFP) and the intrinsic optical signal (IOS) during induced epileptiform activity in in vitro cortical slices by the convergent cross-mapping causality analysis method. Two components of the IOS signal have been distinguished: a faster, activity dependent component (IOSh) which changes its sign between transmitted and reflected measurement, thus it is related to the reflectance or the scattering of the tissue and a slower component (IOSl), which is negative in both cases, thus it is resulted by the increase of the absorption of the tissue. We have found a strong, unidirectional, delayed causal effect from LFP to IOSh with 0.5-1s delay, without signs of feedback from the IOSh to the LFP, while the correlation was small and the peaks of the cross correlation function did not reflect the actual causal dependency. Based on these observations, a model has been set up to describe the dependency of the IOSh on the LFP power and IOSh was reconstructed, based on the LFP signal. This study demonstrates that causality analysis can lead to better understanding the physiological interactions, even in case of two data series with drastically different time scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.