Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30914482›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2019

Demonstration of protein cooperativity mediated by RNA structure using the human protein PUM2.

Winston R Becker, Inga Jarmoskaite, Pavanapuresan P Vaidyanathan, William J Greenleaf, Daniel Herschlag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dissecting the energetic architecture within an RNA tertiary structural motif via high-throughput thermodynamic measurements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Exposing Hidden High-Affinity RNA Conformational States.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Winston R BeckerProgram in Biophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94035, USA.
Inga JarmoskaiteDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94035, USA.
Pavanapuresan P VaidyanathanDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94035, USA.
William J GreenleafDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94035, USA.
Daniel HerschlagDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94035, USA.

Funding

Time-resolved small angle X-ray scatteringP01GM066275 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HERSCHLAG, DANIEL · 2003 to 2017
$17.8M
High-resolution modeling of protein-RNA interfacesR01GM121487 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BRADLEY, PHILIP · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
Quantitative high-throughput nucleic acid assays on a sequencing chipR01GM111990 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENLEAF, WILLIAM JAMES · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
Stanford Chem-H Chemistry/Biology Interface Predoctoral Training ProgramT32GM120007 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BERTOZZI, CAROLYN · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM066275NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111990NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121487NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM120007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posttranslational gene regulation requires a complex network of RNA-protein interactions. Cooperativity, which tunes response sensitivities, originates from protein-protein interactions in many systems. For RNA-binding proteins, cooperativity can also be mediated through RNA structure. RNA structural cooperativity (RSC) arises when binding of one protein induces a redistribution of RNA conformational states that enhance access (positive cooperativity) or block access (negative cooperativity) to additional binding sites. As RSC does not require direct protein-protein interactions, it allows cooperativity to be tuned for individual RNAs, via alterations in sequence that alter structural stability. Given the potential importance of this mechanism of control and our desire to quantitatively dissect features that underlie physiological regulation, we developed a statistical mechanical framework for RSC and tested this model by performing equilibrium binding measurements of the human PUF family protein PUM2. Using 68 RNAs that contain two to five PUM2-binding sites and RNA structures of varying stabilities, we observed a range of structure-dependent cooperative behaviors. To test our ability to account for this cooperativity with known physical constants, we used PUM2 affinity and nearest-neighbor RNA secondary structure predictions. Our model gave qualitative agreement for our disparate set of 68 RNAs across two temperatures, but quantitative deviations arise from overestimation of RNA structural stability. Our results demonstrate cooperativity mediated by RNA structure and underscore the power of quantitative stepwise experimental evaluation of mechanisms and computational tools.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalBase SequenceBinding SitesGene Expression RegulationHumansKineticsNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA StabilityThermodynamicsPUM2 protein, humanRNARNA-Binding Proteinscooperativityposttranscriptional regulationRNARNA secondary structurestatistical mechanics

Identifiers

PMID30914482
PMCPMC6521599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.