Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30914080›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2019

Influenza surveillance: determining the epidemic threshold for influenza by using the Moving Epidemic Method (MEM), Montenegro, 2010/11 to 2017/18 influenza seasons.

Bozidarka Rakocevic, Anita Grgurevic, Goran Trajkovic, Boban Mugosa, Sandra Sipetic Grujicic, Sanja Medenica, Olivera Bojovic, José Eugenio Lozano Alonso, Tomas Vega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The experience of point-of-care testing for influenza in Scotland in 2017/18 and 2018/19 - no gain without pain.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bozidarka RakocevicCenter for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Public Health, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Anita GrgurevicThese authors contributed equally to this work.
Goran TrajkovicInstitute for Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Boban MugosaCenter for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Public Health, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Sandra Sipetic GrujicicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Sanja MedenicaCenter for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Public Health, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Olivera BojovicDepartment for Tuberculosis, Hospital for Lung Disease and Tuberculosis Brezovik, Niksic, Montenegro.
José Eugenio Lozano AlonsoPublic Health Directorate, Castilla y León Regional Health Ministry, Valladolid, Spain.
Tomas VegaPublic Health Directorate, Castilla y León Regional Health Ministry, Valladolid, Spain.

Funding

SUREILLANCE AND RESPONSE TO AVIAN AND PANDEMIC INFLUENZAU51IP000841 · IP · SECID FOUNDATION · PI BINO, SILVA · 2013 to 2015
$1.2M
NCIRD CDC HHS U51 IP000841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2009, an improved influenza surveillance system was implemented and weekly reporting to the World Health Organization on influenza-like illness (ILI) began. The goals of the surveillance system are to monitor and analyse the intensity of influenza activity, to provide timely information about circulating strains and to help in establishing preventive and control measures. In addition, the system is useful for comparative analysis of influenza data from Montenegro with other countries.

aimWe aimed to evaluate the performance and usefulness of the Moving Epidemic Method (MEM), for use in the influenza surveillance system in Montenegro.

methodsHistorical ILI data from 2010/11 to 2017/18 influenza seasons were modelled with MEM. Epidemic threshold for Montenegro 2017/18 season was calculated using incidence rates from 2010/11-2016/17 influenza seasons.

resultsPre-epidemic ILI threshold per 100,000 population was 19.23, while the post-epidemic threshold was 17.55. Using MEM, we identified an epidemic of 10 weeks' duration. The sensitivity of the MEM epidemic threshold in Montenegro was 89% and the warning signal specificity was 99%.

conclusionsOur study marks the first attempt to determine the pre/post-epidemic threshold values for the epidemic period in Montenegro. The findings will allow a more detailed examination of the influenza-related epidemiological situation, timely detection of epidemic and contribute to the development of more efficient measures for disease prevention and control aimed at reducing the influenza-associated morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

EpidemicsEpidemiological MonitoringSentinel SurveillanceDisease NotificationEuropeHumansInfluenza, HumanMontenegroSeasonsTime FactorsincidenceInfluenza-like illnessesMontenegrosurveillancethreshold

Identifiers

PMID30914080
PMCPMC6440585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.