Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30914005›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2019

Neural basis of hunger-driven behaviour in Drosophila.

Suewei Lin, Bhagyashree Senapati, Chang-Hui Tsao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hungry for Knowledge: Octopamine Signaling Regulates Hunger-Enhanced Olfactory Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suewei Lin1 Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica , Taipei , Taiwan, Republic of China.
Bhagyashree Senapati1 Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica , Taipei , Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chang-Hui Tsao1 Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica , Taipei , Taiwan, Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hunger is a motivational state that drives eating and food-seeking behaviour. In a psychological sense, hunger sets the goal that guides an animal in the pursuit of food. The biological basis underlying this purposive, goal-directed nature of hunger has been under intense investigation. With its rich behavioural repertoire and genetically tractable nervous system, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has emerged as an excellent model system for studying the neural basis of hunger and hunger-driven behaviour. Here, we review our current understanding of how hunger is sensed, encoded and translated into foraging and feeding behaviours in the fruit fly.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDrosophila melanogasterEatingFeeding BehaviorHungerModels, BiologicalNerve NetNeuronsOlfactory PathwaysDrosophilafeeding behaviourfood-seeking behaviourhungerneural circuits

Identifiers

PMID30914005
PMCPMC6451361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.