Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30913566›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2019

Strain-Dependent Differences in Sensitivity to Myopia-Inducing Stimuli in Guinea Pigs and Role of Choroid.

Liqin Jiang, Mariana B Garcia, David Hammond, Dinasha Dahanayake, Christine F Wildsoet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Retinoscopes: Past and present.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. IMI 2021 Yearly Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Liqin JiangBerkeley Myopia Research Group, Vision Science Program and School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States.
Mariana B GarciaExponent, Menlo Park, California, United States.
David HammondFaculty of Health, School of Medicine-Optometry, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.
Dinasha DahanayakeBerkeley Myopia Research Group, Vision Science Program and School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States.
Christine F WildsoetBerkeley Myopia Research Group, Vision Science Program and School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States.
University of California, Berkeley · USDeakin University · AUMenlo School · USSingapore Eye Research Institute · SG

Funding

Mechanisms underlying emmetropization and local eye growth regulationR01EY012392 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WILDSOET, CHRISTINE FRANCES · 1999 to 2018
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate differences in sensitivity to myopia-inducing stimuli of two strains of pigmented guinea pigs. Methods: Eleven-day-old animals (New Zealand [NZ], n = 24 and Elm Hill strains [EH], n = 26) wore either a +2 or -2 diopter (D) lens over one eye and a plano lens over the fellow eye for 5 days; other 10-day-old EH (n = 9) and 7-day-old NZ (n = 9) animals were monocularly form-deprived (FD) for 28 days. Choroidal thickness and axial length were measured using A-scan ultrasonography at baseline and after 1 and 5 days for optical defocus treatments, and at baseline and after 28 days for the FD treatment. Refractive errors were measured by retinoscopy. Choroids of untreated animals were also evaluated using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Results: One day of optical defocus induced bidirectional (optical sign-dependent) choroidal responses in EH animals only (P < 0.01). Similar responses were detected in NZ animals after 5 days (P < 0.01), with concordant spherical equivalent refraction changes (P < 0.01). Compared with NZ animals, EH animals developed minimal myopia with FD after 28 days (-4.58 ± 0.97 vs. -0.69 ± 0.75 D for NZ versus EH, P < 0.001). Yet, EH animals showed paradoxical choroidal thickening, 20 ± 9 vs. -8 ± 8 μm for EH versus NZ, P < 0.001. Untreated EH animals also had significantly thicker choroids than NZ animals (147 ± 19 vs. 132 ± 16 μm, P < 0.05), with well-defined layering. Conclusions: As previously reported in chicks, guinea pigs show strain-related differences in response to myopia-inducing stimuli. The finding of a thicker, multilayered choroid in the strain showing decreased sensitivity to FD is provocative, suggesting a possible protective role of the choroid.

Indexed as

Animals, Inbred StrainsAnimalsAxial Length, EyeBiometryChoroidDisease Models, AnimalEmmetropiaGuinea PigsMyopiaRetinoscopySensitivity and SpecificitySensory DeprivationTomography, Optical CoherenceUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30913566
PMCPMC6438103
OpenAlexW2923049799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.