Trial reportCancer2019
FOLFOX plus ziv-aflibercept or placebo in first-line metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase 2 trial.
Trial report in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01191697 (Phase II Trial of CAPOX, Bevacizumab and Trastuzumab for Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Trial of CAPOX, Bevacizumab and Trastuzumab for Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Angiogenesis Inhibitor-Based Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- How to Balance Prognostic Factors in Controlled Phase II Trials: Stratified Permuted Block Randomization or Minimization? An Analysis of Clinical Trials in Digestive Oncology.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes and ctDNA correlates for CAPOX BETR: a phase II trial of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, trastuzumab in previously untreated advanced HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Multiple First-Line Treatments for HER2-Negative Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer in Japan.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- The biology and therapeutic implications of heterogeneity in Barrett oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The Interplay Between Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Its Tumor Microenvironment: Toward Innovative Therapies.Cells · 2025Review
- Clinical advances and challenges of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- The Role of Angiogenesis Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Cost Effectiveness of Adding Pembrolizumab to Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A US Healthcare Payer's Perspective.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Article
- Review
- Review
- Successes and failures of angiogenesis blockade in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Machine Learning for Future Subtyping of the Tumor Microenvironment of Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinomas.Cancers · 2021Review
- Targeted therapies for gastroesophageal cancers.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Improving cancer immunotherapy using nanomedicines: progress, opportunities and challenges.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020Review
- Identification of a Tumor Microenvironment-relevant Gene set-based Prognostic Signature and Related Therapy Targets in Gastric Cancer.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Prognostic value and association of Lauren classification with VEGF and VEGFR-2 expression in gastric cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Targeted and novel therapy in advanced gastric cancer.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2019Review
- Gastric Cancer Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Applications.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntiangiogenic therapy is a proven therapeutic modality for refractory gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This trial assessed whether the addition of a high affinity angiogenesis inhibitor, ziv-aflibercept, could improve the efficacy of first-line mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus plus infusional 5- fluorouracil) in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
methodsPatients with treatment-naive metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) in a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to receive first-line mFOLFOX6 with or without ziv-aflibercept (4 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS).
resultsSixty-four patients were randomized to receive mFOLFOX6 and ziv-aflibercept (43 patients) or mFOLFOX6 and a placebo (21 patients). There was no difference in the PFS, overall survival, or response rate. Patients treated with mFOLFOX6/ziv-aflibercept tended to be more likely to discontinue study treatment for reasons other than progressive disease (P = .06). The relative dose intensity of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil was lower in the mFOLFOX6/ziv-aflibercept arm during the first 12 and 24 weeks of the trial. There were 2 treatment-related deaths due to cerebral hemorrhage and bowel perforation in the mFOLFOX6/ziv-aflibercept cohort.
conclusionsZiv-aflibercept did not increase the anti-tumor activity of first-line mFOLFOX6 in metastatic esophagogastric cancer, potentially because of decreased dose intensity of FOLFOX. Further evaluation of ziv-aflibercept in unselected, chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma is not warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.