Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30913165›Full record

Trial reportPain2019

Pain coping skills training for African Americans with osteoarthritis: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Kelli D Allen, Tamara J Somers, Lisa C Campbell, Liubov Arbeeva, Cynthia J Coffman, Crystal W Cené, Eugene Z Oddone, Francis J Keefe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cultural tailoring of pain management approaches: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelli D AllenThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Tamara J SomersDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Lisa C CampbellDepartment of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.
Liubov ArbeevaThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Cynthia J CoffmanHealth Services Research and Development Service, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Crystal W CenéDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Eugene Z OddoneHealth Services Research and Development Service, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Francis J KeefeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute AD-1408-19519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African Americans bear a disproportionate burden of osteoarthritis (OA), but they have been underrepresented in trials of behavioral interventions for pain. This trial examined a culturally tailored pain coping skills training (CST) program, compared to a wait list control group, among 248 African Americans with knee or hip OA. The pain CST program involved 11 telephone-based sessions over 3 months. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months (primary), and 9 months, and included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (primary outcome), WOMAC total score and function subscale, PROMIS Pain Interference, Short-Form 12 Mental and Physical Composite Subscales, Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Total Coping Attempts, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-8, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, and Patient Global Impression of Arthritis Symptom Change. Linear mixed models were fit for all outcomes. There were no significant between-group differences in WOMAC pain score at 3 months (-0.63 [95% confidence interval -1.45, 0.18]; P = 0.128) or 9 months (-0.84 [95% confidence interval -1.73, 0.06]; P = 0.068). Among secondary outcomes, at 3 months, there were significant differences, in favor of the CST group, for Coping Strategies Questionnaire Total Coping Attempts, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Arthritis Self-Efficacy, and Patient Global Impression of Arthritis Symptom Change (P < 0.01). Coping Strategies Questionnaire Total Coping Attempts, Arthritis Self-Efficacy, and Patient Global Assessment Change were also significantly improved at 9 months in the CST group, compared with wait list (P < 0.01). The culturally tailored pain CST program did not significantly reduce pain severity but did improve key measures of pain coping and perceived ability to manage pain among African Americans with OA.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAdaptation, PsychologicalAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain MeasurementSelf EfficacyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30913165
PMCPMC6719680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.