Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30912836›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2019

Effect of Sustained Inflations vs Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation on Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia or Death Among Extremely Preterm Infants: The SAIL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Haresh Kirpalani, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Martin Keszler, Peter G Davis, Elizabeth E Foglia, Arjan Te Pas, Melissa Fernando, Aasma Chaudhary, Russell Localio, Anton H van Kaam and 22 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02139800 nacompletednot on this map

Sustained Aeration of Infant Lungs Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2014 to 2020Enrolled460ConditionsPreterm Birth, Extreme PrematurityArmsSustained Inflation, Standard of Care
NCT06458582 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Nasal Cannula is Appropriate Alternative for Stabilization of Very Premature Infants: a Prospective Observational Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2021 to 2022Enrolled65ConditionsPremature, InfantArmsHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula
NCT06543589 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised Trial Comparing of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Cpap for Initial Respiratory Stabilisation of Very Premature Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2024 to 2026Enrolled443ConditionsPremature, InfantArmsHigh-flow-nasal-cannula
NCT06683677 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

High Flow Nasal Cannula is Appropriate Alternative for Stabilization of Extremely Premature Infants: a Prospective Observational Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2024 to 2029Enrolled60ConditionsPremature Infant, Ventilation Therapy, High Flow Nasal CanulaArmsHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. [Application of sustained lung inflation in preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks: a Meta analysis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2024
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Non-invasive ventilation in the delivery room.European journal of pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Haresh KirpalaniDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sarah J RatcliffeDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Martin KeszlerWarren Alpert Medical School, Department of Pediatrics, Brown University Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence.
Peter G DavisNewborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth E FogliaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Arjan Te PasDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Melissa FernandoDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Aasma ChaudharyDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Russell LocalioDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Anton H van KaamDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wes OnlandDepartment of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Louise S OwenNewborn Research Center and Neonatal Services, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Georg M SchmölzerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Anup KatheriaDepartment of Neonatology, Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns, San Diego, California.
Helmut HummlerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Gianluca ListaDepartment of Pediatrics, NICU, Ospedale dei Bambini V. Buzzi, ASST-FBF-Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Soraya AbbasiDivision of Newborn Pediatrics, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia.
Daniel KlotzCenter for Pediatrics, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Burkhard SimmaDepartment of Pediatrics, Academic Teaching Hospital, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Vinay NadkarniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Francis R PoulainDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Steven M DonnDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Han-Suk KimDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Soon ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Claudia CadetDepartment of Neonatology, WakeMed Health and Hospitals, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Juin Yee KongDepartment of Neonatology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Alexandra SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, Tufts Clinical and Translational Research Institute, The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ursula GuillenChristiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware.
Helen G LileyNewborn Services, Mater Mothers' Hospital and Mater Research, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew O HopperDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
Masanori TamuraDepartment of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
SAIL Site Investigators
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Pennsylvania · USChristiana Care Health System · USC. S. Mott Children's Hospital · USKK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGLandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATLeiden University Medical Center · NLLoma Linda University · USMater Mothers' Hospital · AUOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITPennsylvania Hospital · USRoyal Women's Hospital · AUSeoul National University Children's Hospital · KRSharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns · USSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPSungkyunkwan University · KRThe University of Melbourne · AUTufts Children's Hospital · USUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

The SAIL trial [Sustained Aeration of Infant Lungs]U01HD072906 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI KESZLER, MARTIN, KIRPALANI, HARESH · 2013 to 2017
$5.5M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD072906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Preterm infants must establish regular respirations at delivery. Sustained inflations may establish lung volume faster than short inflations. Objective: To determine whether a ventilation strategy including sustained inflations, compared with standard intermittent positive pressure ventilation, reduces bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or death at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age without harm in extremely preterm infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: Unmasked, randomized clinical trial (August 2014 to September 2017, with follow-up to February 15, 2018) conducted in 18 neonatal intensive care units in 9 countries. Preterm infants 23 to 26 weeks' gestational age requiring resuscitation with inadequate respiratory effort or bradycardia were enrolled. Planned enrollment was 600 infants. The trial was stopped after enrolling 426 infants, following a prespecified review of adverse outcomes. Interventions: The experimental intervention was up to 2 sustained inflations at maximal peak pressure of 25 cm H2O for 15 seconds using a T-piece and mask (n = 215); standard resuscitation was intermittent positive pressure ventilation (n = 211). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of BPD or death at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. There were 27 prespecified secondary efficacy outcomes and 7 safety outcomes, including death at less than 48 hours. Results: Among 460 infants randomized (mean [SD] gestational age, 25.30 [0.97] weeks; 50.2% female), 426 infants (92.6%) completed the trial. In the sustained inflation group, 137 infants (63.7%) died or survived with BPD vs 125 infants (59.2%) in the standard resuscitation group (adjusted risk difference [aRD], 4.7% [95% CI, -3.8% to 13.1%]; P = .29). Death at less than 48 hours of age occurred in 16 infants (7.4%) in the sustained inflation group vs 3 infants (1.4%) in the standard resuscitation group (aRD, 5.6% [95% CI, 2.1% to 9.1%]; P = .002). Blinded adjudication detected an imbalance of rates of early death possibly attributable to resuscitation (sustained inflation: 11/16; standard resuscitation: 1/3). Of 27 secondary efficacy outcomes assessed by 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, 26 showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among extremely preterm infants requiring resuscitation at birth, a ventilation strategy involving 2 sustained inflations, compared with standard intermittent positive pressure ventilation, did not reduce the risk of BPD or death at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. These findings do not support the use of ventilation with sustained inflations among extremely preterm infants, although early termination of the trial limits definitive conclusions. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02139800.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematureIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationAsphyxia NeonatorumBradycardiaBronchopulmonary DysplasiaFemaleFunctional Residual CapacityGestational AgeHeart RateHospital MortalityHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMale

Identifiers

PMID30912836
PMCPMC6439695
OpenAlexW2924961472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.