ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019
The Rise of the Empowered Physician in the Digital Health Era: Viewpoint.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation of Machine Learning Applications in Health Care Organizations: Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence online engine in migraine: A multi-center study.Headache · 2022Trial
- Assessing digital health curriculum needs: a mixed-methods study of student and faculty perspectives in a Singapore medical school.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Implications for Care Relationships in Technology-Supported Stroke Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Interview Study.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- Moving Research to Practice: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient Perspectives of the Implementation and Sustainability of a Digital Health Intervention for Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- First the relationship, then the technology: Healthcare professionals' perceptions on how digital health solutions impact the interaction with patients.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Physician-Patient Communication and Physicians' Acceptance of a Tailored Digital Health Information Service: Quantitative Online Survey.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Qualitative study on physicians' acceptance of a clinical decision support system for anemia management in patients receiving hemodialysis.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Primary care physicians' perspectives on digital health tools for chronic disease management: A rapid review.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Patient-Focused eHealth Intervention, My Kidneys My Health, in Primary Care and General Nephrology Clinics: Multimethods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Analysis of the impact of a university distance learning course on digitalization in medicine on students and healthcare professionals.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
- Augmented intelligence in precision medicine: Transforming clinical decision-making with AI/ML and/or quantitative systems pharmacology models.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians' Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A landscape analysis of digital health technology in medical schools: preparing students for the future of health care.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The case for inclusive co-creation in digital health innovation.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A review.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Scoping Review Shows the Dynamics and Complexities Inherent to the Notion of "Responsibility" in Artificial Intelligence within the Healthcare Context.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- Two cities, two stages in transforming society-a mixed methods study comparing doctors' adoption of mobile apps for communication with patients in Hangzhou and Yancheng, China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Unveiling the digital future: perspectives of Hungarian physicians under 35 years old on eHealth solutions.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- The Adaptation of Digital Health Solutions During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary: A Scoping Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Being a 21st-century health care provider is extremely demanding. The growing number of chronic diseases, lack of medical workforce, increasing amounts of administrative tasks, the cost of medical treatment, and rising life expectancy result in an immense challenge for medical professionals. This transformation has been triggered by the growing presence of digital health. Digital health does not only refer to technological transformation; it also fundamentally reshapes the physician-patient relationship and treatment circumstances. We argue that patient empowerment, the spread of digital health, the biopsychosocial-digital approach, and the disappearance of the ivory tower of medicine lead to a new role for physicians. Digital health allows the job of being a medical professional to become more rewarding and creative. The characteristics of a physician-as-idol could shift from self-confident to curious, from rule follower to creative, and from lone hero to team worker. Empowered physicians (e-physicians) can be described as "electronic," where they use digital technologies in their practice with ease; "enabled," where they are enabled by regulations and guidelines; and "empowered," where they are empowered by technologies that support their job and their empowered patients (e-patients). They can be described as "experts" in the use of technologies in their practice or in knowing the best, most reliable, and trustworthy digital health sources and technologies. They can also be described as "engaged," when understanding the feelings and points of view of their patients, giving relevant feedback, and involving them throughout the whole healing process. The skills and approaches that characterize this era of e-physicians, such as face-to-face communication skills, digital literacy, interdisciplinarity, knowing where to find information, translating large amounts of data into insights for patients, among others, should always have been at the core of practicing medicine. However, the economical, technological, and administrative burden of the profession has not made it possible for most physicians to enjoy the benefits of their training, individual capabilities, and creativity. By understanding how digital health technologies can support or augment their capabilities, physicians would have the chance to practice the art of medicine like never before.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.