ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2019
Joint Encoding of Auditory Timing and Location in Visual Cortex.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Superior Temporal Gyrus Evokes Rapid Responses in Human Visual Cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Spectrotemporal signatures of driving and modulatory circuits across cortical and subcortical networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spectrotemporal signatures of driving- and modulatory circuits across cortical and subcortical networks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- The role of beta band phase resetting in audio-visual temporal order judgment.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2025Article
- Investigating the correlation between cortical lateralization and personality traits in young Chinese adults through structural magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Neural Oscillations and Multisensory Processing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Modality-Attention Promotes the Neural Effects of Precise Timing Prediction in Early Sensory Processing.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Visual cortex responds to sound onset and offset during passive listening.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Multisensory stimuli shift perceptual priors to facilitate rapid behavior.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Anatomy and activity patterns in a multifunctional motor neuron and its surrounding circuits.eLife · 2021Article
- Electrocorticography Evidence of Tactile Responses in Visual Cortices.Brain topography · 2020Article
- Synchronisation of Neural Oscillations and Cross-modal Influences.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2020Review
- Stochastic resonance model of synaesthesia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Co-occurring sounds can facilitate perception of spatially and temporally correspondent visual events. Separate lines of research have identified two putatively distinct neural mechanisms underlying two types of crossmodal facilitations: Whereas crossmodal phase resetting is thought to underlie enhancements based on temporal correspondences, lateralized occipital evoked potentials (ERPs) are thought to reflect enhancements based on spatial correspondences. Here, we sought to clarify the relationship between these two effects to assess whether they reflect two distinct mechanisms or, rather, two facets of the same underlying process. To identify the neural generators of each effect, we examined crossmodal responses to lateralized sounds in visually responsive cortex of 22 patients using electrocorticographic recordings. Auditory-driven phase reset and ERP responses in visual cortex displayed similar topography, revealing significant activity in pericalcarine, inferior occipital-temporal, and posterior parietal cortex, with maximal activity in lateral occipitotemporal cortex (potentially V5/hMT+). Laterality effects showed similar but less widespread topography. To test whether lateralized and nonlateralized components of crossmodal ERPs emerged from common or distinct neural generators, we compared responses throughout visual cortex. Visual electrodes responded to both contralateral and ipsilateral sounds with a contralateral bias, suggesting that previously observed laterality effects do not emerge from a distinct neural generator but rather reflect laterality-biased responses in the same neural populations that produce phase-resetting responses. These results suggest that crossmodal phase reset and ERP responses previously found to reflect spatial and temporal facilitation in visual cortex may reflect the same underlying mechanism. We propose a new unified model to account for these and previous results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.