Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30912628›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

The effect of adopting pediatric protocols in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatric vs adult centers: An IMPACT Cohort study.

Sumit Gupta, Jason D Pole, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Cindy Lau, Chenthila Nagamuthu, Paul C Nathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Liver Cancer Mortality Rates in Peru: Trend Analysis from 2003 to 2017.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) vs pediatric patients: survival, risks, and barriers to enrollment.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sumit GuptaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1334-3670
Jason D PoleCancer Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nancy N BaxterCancer Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4793-4620
Rinku SutradharCancer Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-6042
Cindy LauCancer Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chenthila NagamuthuCancer Research Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul C NathanDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrospective studies have shown adolescents and young adults (AYA) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have superior survival when treated in pediatric versus adult centers (locus of care; LOC). Several adult centers recently adopted pediatric protocols. Whether this has narrowed LOC disparities in real-world settings is unknown.

methodsThe IMPACT Cohort is an Ontario population-based cohort that captured demographic, disease and treatment (treatment protocol, chemotherapy doses) data for all 15-21 year olds diagnosed with ALL 1992-2011. Cancer outcomes were determined by chart abstraction and linkage to provincial healthcare databases. Treatment protocols were classified as pediatric- or adult-based. We examined predictors of outcome, including LOC, protocol, disease biology, and time period.

resultsOf 271 patients, 152 (56%) received therapy at adult centers. 5-year event-free survival (EFS ± SE) among AYA at pediatric vs adult centers was 72% ± 4% vs 56% ± 4% (P = 0.03); 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82% ± 4% vs 64% ± 4% (P < 0.001). After adjustment, OS remained inferior at adult centers (hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.1; P = 0.04). In the most recent period (2006-2011), 39/59 (66%) AYA treated at adult centers received pediatric protocols. These AYA had outcomes superior to the 20 AYA treated on adult protocols, but inferior to the 44 AYA treated at pediatric centers (EFS 72% ± 5% vs 60% ± 9% vs 81% ± 6%; P = 0.02; OS 77% ± 7% vs 65% ± 11% vs 91% ± 4%; P = 0.004). Induction deaths and treatment-related mortality did not vary by LOC.

conclusionsSurvival disparities between AYA with ALL treated in pediatric vs adult centers have persisted over time, partially attributable to incomplete adoption of pediatric protocols by adult centers. Although pediatric protocol use has improved survival, residual disparities remain, perhaps due to other differences in care between adult and pediatric centers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic ProtocolsCancer Care FacilitiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOntarioPediatricsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaSurvival AnalysisYoung Adultacute lymphobastic leukemiaadolescents and young adultslocus of carepopulation-basedsurvival

Identifiers

PMID30912628
PMCPMC6536996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.