ArticleInternational review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)2018
What's known about implementing co-located paediatric integrated care: a scoping review.
Article in International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Commonality of 25 component themes of integrated care for children: rapid review of 170 models.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- "Treatment is both psychological and medical": applying mixed methods to the understanding of mental and behavioral health in pediatric specialty medicine.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Mental health interventions for children and young people with long-term health conditions in Children and Young People's Mental Health Services in England.Clinical child psychology and psychiatry · 2024Article
- Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study.Primary health care research & development · 2024Article
- Federally Qualified Health Centers Use of Telehealth to Deliver Integrated Behavioral Health Care During COVID-19.Community mental health journal · 2024Article
- Provider Perspectives on an Integrated Behavioral Health Prevention Approach in Pediatric Primary Care.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023Article
- Promoting optimal mental health outcomes for children and youth.Paediatrics & child health · 2023Review
- Systematic Review: Child Psychiatry Access Program Outcomes.JAACAP open · 2023Article
- La promotion de l'évolution optimale de la santé mentale chez les enfants et les adolescents.Paediatrics & child health · 2023Review
- Pediatric collaborative care outcomes in a regional model.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Protocol for the implementation evaluation of an integrated paediatric and primary care model: Strengthening Care for Children (SC4C).BMJ open · 2022Article
- Community paediatricians' experience of joint working with child and adolescent mental health services: findings from a British national survey.BMJ paediatrics open · 2022Article
- Article
- An Integrated Care Strategy for Pre-schoolers with Suspected Developmental Disorders: The Optimus Co-design Project that has Made it to Regular Care.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Policy Recommendations to Promote Integrated Mental Health Care for Children and Youth.Academic pediatrics · 2021Article
- Evidence for Mental Health Contributions to Medical Care in Diabetes Management: Economic and Professional Considerations.Current diabetes reports · 2020Review
- A Framework for Competencies for the Use of Mobile Technologies in Psychiatry and Medicine: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Review
- Using Quality Improvement to Design Early Childhood Services Navigation in Primary Care.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Implementation of Off-Site Integrated Care for Children: A Scoping Review.Harvard review of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated clinical benefits of integrated care for a range of child and adolescent mental health outcomes. However, there is a significant gap between the evidence for efficacy of integrated care interventions vs their implementation in practice. While several studies have examined large-scale implementation of co-located integrated care for adults, much less is known for children. The goal of this scoping review was to understand how co-located mental health interventions targeting children and adolescents have been implemented and sustained. The literature was systematically searched for interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health that involved a mental health specialist co-located in a primary care setting. Studies reporting on the following implementation outcomes were included: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability. This search identified 34 unique studies, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and survey/mixed method approaches. Components facilitating implementation of on-site integrated behavioural healthcare included interprofessional communication and collaboration at all stages of implementation; clear protocols to facilitate intervention delivery; and co-employment of integrated care providers by specialty clinics. Some studies found differences in service use by demographic factors, and others reported funding challenges affecting sustainability, warranting further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.