Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30912411›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

Prognostic Significance of High Androgen Receptor Expression in Prostatic Acinar Adenocarcinoma

Atif Ali Hashmi, Ghazala Mudassir, Muhammad Irfan, Zubaida Fida Hussain, Shumaila Kanwal Hashmi, Huda Asif, Laila Nisar, Maheen Naeem, Naveen Faridi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Atif Ali HashmiDepartment of Histopathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan. Email: doc_atif2005@yahoo.com
Ghazala MudassirDepartment of Pathology, Shifa College of Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad IrfanDepartment of Statistics, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zubaida Fida HussainDepartment of Histopathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan. Email: doc_atif2005@yahoo.com
Shumaila Kanwal HashmiDepartment of Pathology, CMH Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan.
Huda AsifCMH Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan.
Laila NisarLiaquat National School of Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Maheen NaeemLiaquat National School of Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Naveen FaridiDepartment of Histopathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan. Email: doc_atif2005@yahoo.com
Liaquat National Hospital · PKNishtar Medical College and Hospital · PKShifa International Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quantitative immunohistochemical expression of Androgen receptor (AR) has not been evaluated as a prognostic biomarker of prostate cancer in our population, therefore in the current study we aimed to evaluate the association of AR expression in prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma with various prognostic parameters like tumor quantification, Gleason score, WHO grade group and perineural invasion. Methods: Total 121 cases of biopsy proven prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma were selected from records of pathology department archives from January 2013 till December 2017. Hematoxylin and eosin stained slides and paraffin blocks were retrieved and new sections were cut where necessary. Slides of all cases were reviewed by two senior histopathologists and pathologic characteristics like Gleason score, WHO grade, tumor quantification, perineural and lymphovascular invasion were evaluated. Androgen receptor immunohistochemistry was applied on all cases. Results: Low AR expression was noted in 53 cases (43.8%) while high AR expression was seen in 68 cases (56.2%). Significant association of AR expression was noted with total Gleason score, WHO grade and percentage of tissue involvement (tumor quantification). Univariate binary logistic regression showed patients with low Gleason scores (scores 6,7 or 8) and low WHO grade (grade 1, 2 or 3) were less likely to express high AR expression in comparison to high Gleason score (score 9) and high WHO grade group (grade 5) respectively. Similarly, cases with low tissue involvement by carcinoma (<50%) were less likely to show high AR expression in comparison to cases with >50% tissue involvement by carcinoma. Conclusion: Significant association of AR expression was noted with total Gleason score, WHO grade and percentage of tissue involvement (tumor quantification) which are among the most important markers of tumor progression; therefore we suggest that AR expression should be performed in patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma for prognostic stratification of the patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Acinar CellFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenAR protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, AndrogenAndrogen receptorAR- prostatic carcinomaGleason scoreWHO grade group

Identifiers

PMID30912411
PMCPMC6825794
OpenAlexW2923886120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.