Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30912404›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

The Prefectural Participation Rates of Lung Cancer Screening Had a Negative Correlation with the Lung Cancer Mortality Rates

Motoyasu Sagawa, Ryoko Machii, Tomio Nakayama, Takafumi Sugawara, Naoya Ishibashi, Hideki Mitomo, Takashi Kondo, Toshiharu Tabata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Motoyasu SagawaDivision of Endoscopy, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan. Email: sagawam@tohoku-mpu.ac.jp
Ryoko MachiiDivision of Medical Support and Partnership, Center for Cancer Control and Information Service, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, japan.
Tomio NakayamaDivision of Screening Assessment and Management, Center for Public Health Service, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi SugawaraDivision of Chest Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Naoya IshibashiDivision of Chest Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Hideki MitomoDivision of Chest Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Takashi KondoDivision of Chest Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Toshiharu TabataDivision of Chest Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The participation rate is one of the most important indexes in the cancer screening. Historically in Japan, each local government has developed their own equations to calculate the subjects for population-based screening, which were different from each other, and therefore the participation rates of screening were not comparable. Recently, local governments were ordered to use the standardized equation in reporting data, which made it possible to compare the participation rates of cancer screening nationwide for the first time. We therefore investigated the correlation between the prefectural lung cancer mortality and several indicators of lung cancer screening. Methods: The prefectural participation rates of lung, gastric and colonic cancer screening, test positive rates, attendance rates for further examination, lung cancer detection rates and positive predictive values of lung cancer screening were collected from “Cancer Registration and Statistics” of the National Cancer Research Center website. The age-adjusted lung, gastric and colonic cancer mortality rates, smoking rates were also collected. The EZR software program was used for statistical analyses. Results: The participation rates of lung cancer screening had a strong positive correlation with the participation rates of gastric/colonic cancer screening (P<0.001). The prefectural lung cancer mortality rates had a moderate to weak negative correlation with the participation rates of lung cancer screening (P=0.009). A little correlation was noted between other quality assurance indicators of lung cancer screening and lung cancer mortality rates. Conclusion: These results suggested that participating in lung cancer screening might help reduce lung cancer mortality rates in some extent.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisStomach NeoplasmsSurvival Ratecancer screeningcorrelationecological studylung cancermortality

Identifiers

PMID30912404
PMCPMC6825770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.