Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30912251›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2019

Comparison of productivity and quality of bacterial nanocellulose synthesized using culture media based on seven sugars from biomass.

Genqiang Chen, Guochao Wu, Lin Chen, Wei Wang, Feng F Hong, Leif J Jönsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Low-CostPolymers · 2025
    Article
  5. Bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter hansenii can be improved by successive batch culture.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Genqiang ChenCollege of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-1180
Guochao WuDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Lin ChenCollege of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Wei WangCollege of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Feng F HongCollege of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5120-3519
Leif J JönssonDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3866-0111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Komagataeibacter xylinus ATCC 23770 was statically cultivated in eight culture media based on different carbon sources, viz. seven biomass-derived sugars and one sugar mixture. The productivity and quality of the bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) produced in the different media were compared. Highest volumetric productivity, yield on consumed sugar, viscometric degree of polymerization (DP

Indexed as

Carbohydrate MetabolismAcetobacteraceaeBiomassCelluloseCulture MediaNanostructuresPlant ExtractsCelluloseCulture MediaPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID30912251
PMCPMC6559334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.