Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30912096›Full record

ReviewSeminars in liver disease2019

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Metabolic Liver Diseases and Hepatic Fibrosis.

Jessica L Maiers, Harmeet Malhi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in liver disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L MaiersDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Harmeet MalhiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USWinnMed · US

Funding

Pathobiology of Liver InjuryR01DK111378 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MALHI, HARMEET · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
REGULATION OF HEPATIC FIBROGENEISS BY TANGO1K01DK112915 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MAIERS, JESSICA L · 2018 to 2022
$750k
DK111378, DK112915 NIHNIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK112915NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a major contributor to liver disease and hepatic fibrosis, but the role it plays varies depending on the cause and progression of the disease. Furthermore, ER stress plays a distinct role in hepatocytes versus hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), which adds to the complexity of understanding ER stress and its downstream signaling through the unfolded protein response (UPR) in liver disease. Here, the authors focus on the current literature of ER stress in nonalcoholic and alcoholic fatty liver diseases, how ER stress impacts hepatocyte injury, and the role of ER stress in HSC activation and hepatic fibrosis. This review provides insight into the complex signaling and regulation of the UPR, parallels and distinctions between different liver diseases, and how ER stress may be targeted as an antisteatotic or antifibrotic therapy to limit the progression of liver disease.

Indexed as

Endoplasmic Reticulum StressAnimalsFatty LiverHepatic Stellate CellsHepatocytesHumansLiver CirrhosisProteostasis DeficienciesSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID30912096
PMCPMC6530577
OpenAlexW2924326463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.