ArticleMemory & cognition2019
A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction error is out of context: The dominance of contextual stability in structuring episodic memories.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Crossmodal semantic congruence and rarity improve episodic memory.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- Locus coeruleus activation 'resets' hippocampal event representations and separates adjacent memories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Neural Activity Differentiates Novel and Learned Event Boundaries.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Visual event boundaries trigger forgetting despite active maintenance in visual working memory.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Transparency, replicability, and discovery in cognitive aging research: A computational modeling approach.Psychology and aging · 2022Article
- Reward prediction errors create event boundaries in memory.Cognition · 2020Review
- Pupil-linked arousal signals track the temporal organization of events in memory.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Explicit Sequence Memory in Recall of Temporally-structured Episodes.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The distinctiveness effect refers to the finding that items that stand out from other items in a learning set are more likely to be remembered later. Traditionally, distinctiveness has been defined based on item features; specifically, an item is deemed to be distinctive if its features are different from the features of other to-be-learned items. We propose that distinctiveness can be redefined based on context change-distinctive items are those with features that deviate from the others in the current temporal context, a recency-weighted running average of experience-and that this context change modulates learning. We test this account with two novel experiments and introduce a formal mathematical model that instantiates our proposed theory. In the experiments, participants studied lists of words, with each word appearing on one of two background colors. Within each list, each color was used for 50% of the words, but the sequence of the colors was controlled so that runs of the same color for that list were common in Experiment 1 and common, rare, or random in Experiment 2. In both experiments, participants' source memory for background color was enhanced for items where the color changed, especially if the change occurred after a stable run without color changes. Conversely, source memory was not significantly better for nonchanges after runs of alternating colors with each item. This pattern is inconsistent with theories of learning based on prediction error, but is consistent with our context-change account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30912034What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.