Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911932›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2019

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): a systematic review of pre-clinical models.

Jonathan E Millar, Nicole Bartnikowski, Viktor von Bahr, Maximilian V Malfertheiner, Nchafatso G Obonyo, Mirko Belliato, Jacky Y Suen, Alain Combes, Daniel F McAuley, Roberto Lorusso and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jonathan E MillarCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, 4035 QLD, Australia. j.millar@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4853-9377
Nicole BartnikowskiCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, 4035 QLD, Australia.
Viktor von BahrCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, 4035 QLD, Australia.
Maximilian V MalfertheinerCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, 4035 QLD, Australia.
Nchafatso G ObonyoCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, 4035 QLD, Australia.
Mirko BelliatoU.O.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione 1, IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Jacky Y SuenCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, 4035 QLD, Australia.
Alain CombesMedical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Daniel F McAuleyWellcome-Wolfson Centre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Roberto LorussoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Hospital, Maastricht, Netherlands.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, 4035 QLD, Australia.
European Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation (EuroELSO) Innovations Workgroup
National Health Medical Research Council Australia Centre of Research Excellence for Advanced Cardio-respiratory Therapies Improving Organ Support (NHMRC CREACTIONS)

Funding

Department of Health HTA/13/143/02National Health and Medical Research Council APP1079421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an increasingly accepted means of supporting those with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Given the high mortality associated with ARDS, numerous animal models have been developed to support translational research. Where ARDS is combined with ECMO, models are less well characterized. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review of animal models combining features of experimental ARDS with ECMO to better understand this situation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and Embase were searched between January 1996 and December 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria: animal models combining features of experimental ARDS with ECMO. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: clinical studies, abstracts, studies in which the model of ARDS and ECMO has been reported previously, and studies not employing veno-venous, veno-arterial, or central ECMO. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted to fully characterize models. Variables related to four key features: (1) study design, (2) animals and their peri-experimental care, (3) models of ARDS and mechanical ventilation, and (4) ECMO and its intra-experimental management. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventeen models of ARDS and ECMO were identified. Twelve were published after 2009. All were performed in large animals, the majority (n = 10) in pigs. The median number of animals included in each study was 17 (12-24), with a median study duration of 8 h (5-24). Oleic acid infusion was the commonest means of inducing ARDS. Most models employed peripheral veno-venous ECMO (n = 12). The reporting of supportive measures and the practice of mechanical ventilation were highly variable. Descriptions of ECMO equipment and its management were more complete.

conclusionA limited number of models combine the features of experimental ARDS with ECMO. Among those that do, there is significant heterogeneity in both design and reporting. There is a need to standardize the reporting of pre-clinical studies in this area and to develop best practice in their design.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeAnimal modelsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationPre-clinical modelsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30911932
PMCPMC6434011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.