Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911927›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

A prospective study on the effect of time-shifted telephone reporting of blood culture microscopy.

T Gehring, H Kim, A Hoerauf, C Buechler

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) for positive blood cultures in clinical practice using a total lab automation.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T GehringInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany. thomas.gehring@ukbonn.de.
H KimInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
A HoeraufInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
C BuechlerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though dealing with septic patients, the communication of the Gram stain result of positive blood cultures is postponed in most laboratories outside of conventional working hours. There is little evidence from clinics that this issue is being addressed. This study evaluates the potential benefit of an around-the-clock communication. Therefore, the effect of the communication on the antibiotic treatment and the delay of the communication during our non-office hours were measured. Over a three-month period, all blood cultures which were positive for the first time outside the normal working hours were analyzed. Two standardized telephone calls were used to compare the antibiotic treatment before and after the communication of the Gram stain result. The evaluation of the antibiotic treatment was based on the final testing result. In total, 135 patients were included. The rate of the adequate antibiotic increased by 8 percentage points to 69%. The average delay in the patients adjusted to an adequate treatment was 8:57 h (range 2:16-16:59). This prospective study shows a benefit of the immediate communication. Nevertheless, this benefit seems to be partly the result of suboptimal adherence to the guidelines regarding empirical antibiotic treatment. This prospective study has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under the identifier DRKS00014996 ( http://www.drks.de/DRKS00014996 ).

Indexed as

After-Hours CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBlood CultureGentian VioletHealth CommunicationHumansLaboratories, HospitalMicroscopyPhenazinesProspective StudiesStaining and LabelingTelephoneTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentian VioletGram's stainPhenazinesAntibiotic treatmentBlood cultureCommunicationGram stainMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID30911927
OpenAlexW2936527012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.