ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
Learning needle tip localization from digital subtraction in 2D ultrasound.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated angular measurement for puncture angle using a computer-aided method in ultrasound-guided peripheral insertion.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Robust tip localization under continuous spatial and temporal constraints during 2D ultrasound-guided needle puncture.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal analysis of speckle dynamics to track invisible needle in ultrasound sequences using convolutional neural networks: a phantom study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Approaches for Automatic Localization in Medical Images.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Review
- Time-aware deep neural networks for needle tip localization in 2D ultrasound.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Enhancement of needle visualization and localization in ultrasound.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Review
- Multi-Needle Detection in 3D Ultrasound Images Using Unsupervised Order-Graph Regularized Sparse Dictionary Learning.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis paper addresses localization of needles inserted both in-plane and out-of-plane in challenging ultrasound-guided interventions where the shaft and tip have low intensity. Our approach combines a novel digital subtraction scheme for enhancement of low-level intensity changes caused by tip movement in the ultrasound image and a state-of-the-art deep learning scheme for tip detection.
methodsAs the needle tip moves through tissue, it causes subtle spatiotemporal variations in intensity. Relying on these intensity changes, we formulate a foreground detection scheme for enhancing the tip from consecutive ultrasound frames. The tip is augmented by solving a spatial total variation regularization problem using the split Bregman method. Lastly, we filter irrelevant motion events with a deep learning-based end-to-end data-driven method that models the appearance of the needle tip in ultrasound images, resulting in needle tip detection.
resultsThe detection model is trained and evaluated on an extensive ex vivo dataset collected with 17G and 22G needles inserted in-plane and out-of-plane in bovine, porcine and chicken phantoms. We use 5000 images extracted from 20 video sequences for training and 1000 images from 10 sequences for validation. The overall framework is evaluated on 700 images from 20 sequences not used in training and validation, and achieves a tip localization error of 0.72 ± 0.04 mm and an overall processing time of 0.094 s per frame (~ 10 frames per second).
conclusionThe proposed method is faster and more accurate than state of the art and is resilient to spatiotemporal redundancies. The promising results demonstrate its potential for accurate needle localization in challenging ultrasound-guided interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.