Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911846›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

Rice pest management with reduced risk pesticides in India.

Sumitra Arora, Mukesh Sehgal, D S Srivastava, Sanjay Arora, Susheel Kumar Sarkar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sumitra AroraICAR-National Research Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa Campus, New Delhi-12, India. sumitraarora@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6194-5217
Mukesh SehgalICAR-National Research Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Pusa Campus, New Delhi-12, India.
D S SrivastavaKVK-II, Katia, Sitapur, U.P., India.
Sanjay AroraICAR-CSSRI, RRS, Lucknow, U.P., India.
Susheel Kumar SarkarICAR-IASRI, Pusa Campus, New Delhi-12, India.
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute · INIndian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · INNational Research Centre for Integrated Pest Management · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sitapur district in the Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) state of northern India has been observed to consume large amounts of WHO classified "extremely" and "highly hazardous" pesticides, in rice crop, posing significant health and environmental threats. Keeping in view this problem, integrated pest management (IPM) modules were synthesized for rice crop and then compared with non-IPM/farmer's practice (NIPM). This study assisted in identifying pesticides with reduced risk to the environment. To measure and compare risks, environmental impact quotient (EIQ) has been used as a pesticide risk indicator model, between IPM and NIPM programs. Using this model, the field EIQ values (EIQ field use rating or EIQ-FUR), for 32 commonly used pesticides in the region, were evaluated based on dosage, frequency, and percent active ingredients present in the pesticide formulations. The results conclude that copper oxychloride (CuOCl

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimalsArthropodsEnvironmentEnvironmental MonitoringFarmersHumansIndiaModels, TheoreticalOryzaPest ControlPesticidesPesticidesEnvironmental impact quotientPesticideReduced riskRice

Identifiers

PMID30911846
OpenAlexW2923034111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.