ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019
Efficacy of a transdiagnostic, video-based online program for reducing depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in adults: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of a Transdiagnostic Self-Help Internet Intervention for Reducing Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidal Ideation in Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- A scoping review of digital interventions for the promotion of mental health and prevention of mental health conditions for young people.Oxford open digital health · 2025Review
- The Effect of Dissemination Pathways on Uptake and Relative Costs for a Transdiagnostic, Self-guided Internet Intervention for Reducing Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidal Ideation: Comparative Implementation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Consumer-Guided Development of an Engagement-Facilitation Intervention for Increasing Uptake and Adherence for Self-Guided Web-Based Mental Health Programs: Focus Groups and Online Evaluation Survey.JMIR formative research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransdiagnostic online interventions have the potential to overcome help seeking barriers, address symptom comorbidity, and increase accessibility to evidence-based treatments. However, there is currently a lack of high quality studies examining brief transdiagnostic interventions, as well as research examining optimal methods for screening and providing members of the community with access to these interventions. This randomised controlled trial will compare a brief, video-based transdiagnostic online intervention (
aimsThe aims of the study are to (1) examine the efficacy of
methodsA two-arm randomised controlled trial will be conducted with adults residing in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Participants will be recruited online via social media advertisements, screened, and randomised to receive one of two four-week programs:
resultsFindings from the trial will provide important knowledge regarding the utility and optimal implementation of brief transdiagnostic interventions for depression and anxiety in the community.
conclusionsThis trial has strong potential to increase access to evidence-based treatments in the community by directly addressing several factors that impede this access, such as symptom comorbidity and a lack of knowledge regarding optimal implementation pathways.
trial registrationThis trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (number ACTRN12618001688279).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.