Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911652›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2018

Therapeutic efficacy of systemic therapy for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Surgeon's perspective.

Jan Franko

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. [BMJ open · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pleura and peritoneum · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan FrankoChair of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, 411 Laurel Street, Suite 2100, Des Moines, IA 50314, USA.
Mercy Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment choices for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis/metastases include systemic therapy and increasingly cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy delivery. These options are best considered as complementary and not exclusive alternatives. Two prospective randomized trials support use of peritonectomy procedures and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. This overview examines efficacy, limitations and landscape of systemic therapy focusing on colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Observations from literature support notions that (1) systemic therapy provides survival benefit for all prototypical patients with mCRC irrespective of metastatic disease site; (2) the magnitude of this benefit is considerably reduced among patients with peritoneal metastases who consequently experience significantly shorter overall survival; (3) efficacy of systemic therapy improved over time but at a slower pace for those with carcinomatosis; (4) this therapeutic difference has not diminished with introduction of targeted therapy, but perhaps widened; (5) further research of cytoreductive surgery and/or intraperitoneal regional therapies is thus a multidisciplinary responsibility of the entire oncology community; (6) peritonectomy procedures with intraperitoneal regional therapy are not scientifically supported in absence of systemic therapies.

Indexed as

cytoreductionhyperthermiaintraperitoneal chemotherapyintraperitoneal therapyperitoneal surfaceperitonectomy

Identifiers

PMID30911652
PMCPMC6405010
OpenAlexW2795923038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.