Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911638›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2017

Experimental pharmacokinetics evaluation of chemotherapy delivery by PIPAC for colon cancer: first evidence for efficacy.

Clarisse Eveno, Aminata Haidara, Ibrahim Ali, Cynthia Pimpie, Massoud Mirshahi, Marc Pocard

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution advantages of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin over systemic delivery: a swine model comparison of PIPAC and HPIPAC.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A real-timePleura and peritoneum · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clarisse EvenoDepartment of Oncologic & Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Aminata HaidaraUniversité Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CART, Carcinomatosis Angiogenesis Translational Research, INSERM U965, Paris, France.
Ibrahim AliUniversité Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CART, Carcinomatosis Angiogenesis Translational Research, INSERM U965, Paris, France.
Cynthia PimpieUniversité Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CART, Carcinomatosis Angiogenesis Translational Research, INSERM U965, Paris, France.
Massoud MirshahiUniversité Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CART, Carcinomatosis Angiogenesis Translational Research, INSERM U965, Paris, France.
Marc PocardDepartment of Oncologic & Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France.
Délégation Paris 7 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel technique of intraperitoneal chemotherapy devoted to unresectable peritoneal metastasis (PM). The first results obtained with PIPAC in preclinical models of colon cancer are presented here.

methods

results

conclusionsPIPAC with low-dose oxaliplatin is efficient in both

Indexed as

chemotherapycolon cancerhyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)oxaliplatinperitoneal metastasispressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)

Identifiers

PMID30911638
PMCPMC6405032
OpenAlexW2621270745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.