Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911461›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2019

The association of financial incentives for low density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with patient activation and motivation.

Tianyu Liu, Kevin G Volpp, David A Asch, Jingsan Zhu, Wenli Wang, Ruoming Wu, Andrea B Troxel, Darra D Finnerty, Karen Hoffer, Judy A Shea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Study design of BETTER-BP: Behavioral economics trial to enhance regulation of blood pressure.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tianyu LiuUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Kevin G VolppUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
David A AschUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Jingsan ZhuUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Wenli WangUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Ruoming WuUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Andrea B TroxelUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Darra D FinnertyUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Karen HofferUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.
Judy A SheaUniversity of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in using financial incentives for patients to improve medication adherence, but few studies have evaluated whether financial incentives are associated with patients' activation and motivation. We analyzed survey data collected as part of a randomized clinical trial conducted from 2011 to 2014 of four financial incentive interventions to reduce low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among patients at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The main trial included 1503 patients aged 18-80 and recruited from primary care practices affiliated with three health systems. Participants were randomized into four groups: patient financial incentives, primary care physicians (PCPs) incentives, patients and PCPs shared incentives, or no incentives for LDL-C control. Patient Activation Measure (PAM) and Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) surveys were administered at baseline and 12 months. Clinical outcomes were change in LDL-C at 12 and 15 months and average medication adherence as measured by electronic pill bottle opening. Mean changes in PAM and TSRQ scores were compared between patients eligible and not eligible for incentives. Clinical outcomes were tested against baseline and change in psychosocial measures using bivariate and multivariate regression. Change in PAM score and TSRQ autonomous subscore did not differ significantly between patients eligible and not eligible for incentives. Lower baseline and greater increase in TSRQ autonomous subscore were predictive of greater 15-month decrease in LDL-C. A financial incentive intervention to improve LDL-C control was not associated with changes in patients' activation or autonomous motivation. Increases in patient autonomous motivation are predictive of long-term LDL-C control.

Indexed as

Behavioral economicsCholesterolIncentivesMotivationPatient activation

Identifiers

PMID30911461
PMCPMC6416647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.