Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911346›Full record

Trial reportOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2019

Impairment on Cardiopulmonary Function after Marathon: Role of Exhaled Nitric Oxide.

Ana Paula Sierra, Manoel Carneiro Oliveira-Junior, Francine Maria Almeida, Marino Benetti, Rodrigo Oliveira, Soraia Nogueira Felix, Isabella Santos Genaro, Beatriz Mangueira Saraiva Romanholo, Nabil Ghorayeb, Maria Augusta Peduti Dal Molin Kiss and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Marathon-Induced Cardiac Fatigue: A Review over the Last Decade for the Preservation of the Athletes' Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Paula SierraSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8547-7195
Manoel Carneiro Oliveira-JuniorNove de Julho University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-9920
Francine Maria AlmeidaLaboratory of Experimental Therapeutic (LIM 20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marino BenettiSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo OliveiraInstitute of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences (ICAFE), Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), São Paulo, Brazil.
Soraia Nogueira FelixLaboratory of Experimental Therapeutic (LIM 20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabella Santos GenaroLaboratory of Experimental Therapeutic (LIM 20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Beatriz Mangueira Saraiva RomanholoLaboratory of Experimental Therapeutic (LIM 20), School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nabil GhorayebSports Cardiology Department, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Augusta Peduti Dal Molin KissSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda Cury-BoaventuraInstitute of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences (ICAFE), Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1596-0624
João Bosco PesqueroDepartment of Biophysics, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodolfo Paula VieiraPost Graduation Program in Bioengenering and in Biomedical Engineering, Universidade Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6379-1143
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Cruzeiro do Sul · BRAnhembi Morumbi University · BRInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Nove de Julho · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endurance exercise is capable of inducing skeletal muscle, heart, and respiratory fatigue, evidenced by morphofunctional cardiac changes, release of myocardial injury biomarkers, and reduction of maximal voluntary ventilation and oxygen consumption (VO PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether marathoners present cardiac fatigue after marathon and whether it correlates with pulmonary levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) and pulmonary inflammation.

methods31 male marathoners, age 39 ± 9 years, were evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise test three weeks before and between three and 15 days after a marathon; eNO analysis and spirometry were evaluated before, immediately after, and 24 and 72 hours after the marathon, and sputum cellularity and cytokine level were assessed before and after the marathon.

resultsMarathon induced an increase in the percentage of macrophages, neutrophils (from 0.65% to 4.28% and 6.79% to 14.11%, respectively), and epithelial cells and a decrease in cytokines in induced sputum, followed by an increase in eNO concentration (20 ± 11 to 35 ± 19 ppb), which presented a significant reduction 24 and 72 hours after marathon (9 ± 12 e 12 ± 9 ppb,

conclusionReduction in eNO bioavailability after marathon prevents the reduction in cardiopulmonary capacity induced by acute inflammatory pattern after marathon.

Indexed as

Exercise TestExhalationAdultCytokinesHumansInflammationLungMaleNitric OxideRunningSputumCytokinesNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID30911346
PMCPMC6398013
OpenAlexW2913159500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.