Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911323›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2019

Utilization of computer vision and multispectral imaging techniques for classification of cowpea (

Gamal ElMasry, Nasser Mandour, Marie-Hélène Wagner, Didier Demilly, Jerome Verdier, Etienne Belin, David Rousseau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cultivars identification of oat (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cultivar Discrimination of Single Alfalfa (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gamal ElMasry1Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, P.O Box 41522, Ismailia, Egypt.
Nasser Mandour1Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, P.O Box 41522, Ismailia, Egypt.
Marie-Hélène WagnerGEVES, Station Nationale d'Essais de Semences (SNES), 49071 Beaucouzé, Angers, France.
Didier DemillyGEVES, Station Nationale d'Essais de Semences (SNES), 49071 Beaucouzé, Angers, France.
Jerome Verdier4INRA, UMR1345 Institut de Recherche en Horticulture et Semences, 49071 Beaucouzé, Angers, France.
Etienne Belin3Laboratoire Angevin de Recherche en Ingénierie des Systèmes (LARIS), Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
David Rousseau3Laboratoire Angevin de Recherche en Ingénierie des Systèmes (LARIS), Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe traditional methods for evaluating seeds are usually performed through destructive sampling followed by physical, physiological, biochemical and molecular determinations. Whilst proven to be effective, these approaches can be criticized as being destructive, time consuming, labor intensive and requiring experienced seed analysts. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the potential of computer vision and multispectral imaging systems supported with multivariate analysis for high-throughput classification of cowpea (

resultsThe results revealed that the LDA models had good accuracy in distinguishing 'Aged' and 'Non-aged' seeds with an overall correct classification (OCC) of 97.51, 96.76 and 97%, 'Germinated' and 'Non-germinated' seeds with OCC of 81.80, 79.05 and 81.0%, 'Early germinated', 'Medium germinated' and 'Dead' seeds with OCC of 77.21, 74.93 and 68.00% and among seeds that give 'Normal' and 'Abnormal' seedlings with OCC of 68.08, 64.34 and 62.00% in training, cross-validation and independent validation data sets, respectively. Image processing routines were also developed to exploit the full power of the multispectral imaging system in visualizing the difference among seed categories by applying the discriminant model in a pixel-wise manner.

conclusionThe results demonstrated the capability of the multispectral imaging system in the ultraviolet, visible and shortwave near infrared range to provide the required information necessary for the discrimination of individual cowpea seeds to different classes. Considering the short time of image acquisition and limited sample preparation, this stat-of-the art multispectral imaging method and chemometric analysis in classifying seeds could be a valuable tool for on-line classification protocols in cost-effective real-time sorting and grading processes as it provides not only morphological and physical features but also chemical information for the seeds being examined. Implementing image processing algorithms specific for seed quality assessment along with the declining cost and increasing power of computer hardware is very efficient to make the development of such computer-integrated systems more attractive in automatic inspection of seed quality.

Indexed as

Black-eyed seedsChemometricCowpea seedsGerminationMultispectral imagingPhenotypingPlant development

Identifiers

PMID30911323
PMCPMC6417027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.