ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2019
Monte Carlo dosimetry for a new
Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of GATE Monte Carlo Code for Simulation and Dosimetry of New I-125 Seeds in Eye Plaque Brachytherapy.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Effect of ME Collimator Characteristic, Energy Window Width, and Reconstruction Algorithm Selection on Imaging Performance of Yttrium-90: Simulation Study.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDosimetric characterization of a new 32P brachytherapy source was studied and the validity of the FLUKA code to reproduce the dosimetric parameters in a water phantom was evaluated. In addition, dose rate distributions around the 32P source sheathed by a catheter and unsheathed source were investigated in different tissue phantoms. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe new 32P source was modeled using FLUKA Monte Carlo code. According to the AAPM TG-60 recommendations, reference of absorbed dose rate, radial dose function, anisotropy function, and an away-along table for quality assurance purposes inside water phantom were calculated. Moreover, the results of the radial dose function and dose rate were obtained for the sheathed source and unsheathed sources at radial distances in different tissue phantoms: liver, fat tissue, 9-component soft tissue, and 4-component soft tissue.
resultsThe calculated dosimetric parameters of the new 32P source by FLUKA code in water phantom agreed well with that of the GEANT4 calculation. The 2D away-along dose results were similar to the GEANT4 simulation for distances less than 0.25 cm, small differences were apparent at long distances from the source. Dose rate evaluation for the sheathed source shows that the presence of a catheter increases the dose values up to 2.11% in comparison with the unsheathed source in water phantom. Our results show that the radial dose function calculated in water, as generalized by AAPM TG-60, differed in tissue, especially at large distances from the source.
conclusionsThis work fully characterizes dosimetric parameters of the sheathed and unsheathed new 32P brachytherapy sources in water and different tissue phantoms by using FLUKA code. The results demonstrate that the dose distribution in water differed from the calculated ones in tissue phantoms due to the densities and atomic composition for tissues that are not taken account by the TG-60 formalism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.