ArticlePolymer reviews (Philadelphia, Pa.)2018
Bio-Based Polymers for 3D Printing of Bioscaffolds.
Article in Polymer reviews (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible multimaterial fibers in modern biomedical applications.National science review · 2024Review
- Rheological Properties and 3D Printing Behavior of PCL and DMSOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Synthesis of Bio-Based Polyester Resins for Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Repurposing of waste PET by microbial biotransformation to functionalized materials for additive manufacturing.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Sustainable Vegetable Oil-Based Biomaterials: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- 3D printing of polylactic acid: recent advances and opportunities.The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology · 2023Review
- Geometry-Based Computational Fluid Dynamic Model for Predicting the Biological Behavior of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Advances in 3D Gel Printing for Enzyme Immobilization.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Emerging 3D Printing Strategies for Enzyme Immobilization: Materials, Methods, and Applications.ACS omega · 2022Review
- 3D Printing: Advancement in Biogenerative Engineering to Combat Shortage of Organs and Bioapplicable Materials.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2022Review
- The Food-Materials Nexus: Next Generation Bioplastics and Advanced Materials from Agri-Food Residues.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021Review
- Review
- Research of TPU Materials for 3D Printing Aiming at Non-Pneumatic Tires by FDM Method.Polymers · 2020Article
- 4D anisotropic skeletal muscle tissue constructs fabricated by staircase effect strategy.Biofabrication · 2019Article
- Advanced 4D Bioprinting Technologies for Brain Tissue Modeling and Study.International journal of smart and nano materials · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies enable not only faster bioconstructs development but also on-demand and customized manufacturing, offering patients a personalized biomedical solution. This emerging technique has a great potential for fabricating bioscaffolds with complex architectures and geometries and specifically tailored for use in regenerative medicine. The next major innovation in this area will be the development of biocompatible and histiogenic 3D printing materials with bio-based printable polymers. This review will briefly discuss 3D printing techniques and their current limitations, with a focus on novel bio-based polymers as 3D printing feedstock for clinical medicine and tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.