Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30911130›Full record

ReviewThe ISME journal2019

Revisiting the 'direct mineral cycling' hypothesis: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonize leaf litter, but why?

Rebecca A Bunn, Dylan T Simpson, Lorinda S Bullington, Ylva Lekberg, David P Janos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ISME journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. N and P constrain C in ecosystems under climate change: Role of nutrient redistribution, accumulation, and stoichiometry.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca A BunnDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Western Washington University, 516 High St., MS-9181, Bellingham, WA, 98225, USA. rebecca.bunn@wwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4679-0912
Dylan T SimpsonDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Western Washington University, 516 High St., MS-9181, Bellingham, WA, 98225, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-868X
Lorinda S BullingtonMPG Ranch, Missoula, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-2762
Ylva LekbergMPG Ranch, Missoula, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1033-8032
David P JanosDepartment of Biology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-0110

Funding

Genomics Resources Core (GRC)P30GM103324 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI SETTLES, MATTHEW · 2013 to 2017
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID30911130
PMCPMC6775977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.