Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30910899›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2019

Characterization of β-Lactamase Content of Ceftazidime-Resistant Pathogens Recovered during the Pathogen-Directed Phase 3 REPRISE Trial for Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Correlation of Efficacy against β-Lactamase Producers.

Rodrigo E Mendes, Mariana Castanheira, Leah N Woosley, Gregory G Stone, Patricia A Bradford, Robert K Flamm

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anti-Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  6. What to Do with the New Antibiotics?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. High Frequency ofInfection & chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiology of β-Lactamase-Producing Pathogens.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rodrigo E MendesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA rodrigo-mendes@jmilabs.com.
Mariana CastanheiraJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Leah N WoosleyJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.
Gregory G StoneAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Patricia A BradfordAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1285-2978
Robert K FlammJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

REPRISE was a pathogen-directed (ceftazidime-resistant) phase 3 prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). This study characterized the β-lactamase content of ceftazidime-resistant

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overbeta-LactamasesCeftazidimeEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPseudomonas aeruginosaYoung Adultbeta-LactamasesCeftazidimecarbapenemaseclinical efficacyCTX-M-15ESBL

Identifiers

PMID30910899
PMCPMC6535560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.