Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30910874›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019

Patient use of an online triage platform: a mixed-methods retrospective exploration in UK primary care.

Abi Eccles, Michael Hopper, Amadea Turk, Helen Atherton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Access to general practice appointments and sustainable change: a focused ethnographic case study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Digital Health and Primary Health Care Quality: A Survey Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  17. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abi EcclesUnit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Michael HopperUnit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Amadea TurkUnit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Helen AthertonUnit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent years have seen the introduction of online triage allowing patients to describe their problem via an online form. Subsequently, a GP telephones the patient, conducting a telephone consultation or arranging a face-to-face consultation.

aimThis study aimed to explore patterns-of-use and patients' experiences of using an online triage system. DESIGN AND

settingThis retrospective study analysed routinely collected data (from all practices using the 'askmyGP' platform for the duration of the study period, 19 May 2017 to 31 July 2017), using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Data originated from an online triaging platform used by patients in nine general practices across the UK.

methodData from 5447 patients were quantitatively analysed to describe characteristics of users, patterns-of-use, and reasons given by patients for using the platform. Free-text comments left by patients (

resultsHighest levels of use were observed in females (65.5%,

conclusionPatterns-of-use and patient types were in line with typical contacts to GP practices. Though the age of users was broad, highest levels of use were from younger patients. The perceived advantages to using online triage, such as convenience and ease of use, are often context dependent.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPrimary Health CareRemote ConsultationTriageAge FactorsAppointments and SchedulesHumansModels, OrganizationalPatient PreferencePractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomelectronic mailgeneral practiceprimary health careremote consultationtriageworkload

Identifiers

PMID30910874
PMCPMC6478479
OpenAlexW2923995503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.