Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30910864›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2019

Personalizing Precision Oncology Clinical Trials in Latin America: An Expert Panel on Challenges and Opportunities.

Roberto Jun Arai, Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini, Andrea Sabina Llera, Juan Manoel O'Connor, Bettina Muller, Mauricio Lema, Helano C Freitas, Tannia Soria, Lucía Delgado, Denis Landaverde and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Managing oncology clinical trials during COVID-19 pandemic.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Roberto Jun AraiNúcleo de Pesquisa, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Santa Cruz GuindaliniCentro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andrea Sabina LleraGenocan Laboratory, Fundación Instituto Leloir - CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Manoel O'ConnorInstituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bettina MullerInstituto Nacional del Cancer, Santiago, Chile.
Mauricio LemaClínica de Oncología Astorga, Medellín, Colombia.
Helano C FreitasAC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Tannia SoriaHospital SOLCA, Quito, Ecuador.
Lucía DelgadoDepartment of Oncology, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidad de la República Oriental del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Denis LandaverdeHospital Mexico and Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Paola MontenegroInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru.
Rachel P RiechelmannAC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil rachel.riechelmann@accamargo.org.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The participation of patients in precision oncology trials needs to fulfill molecular-based selection criteria. This strongly limits accrual, and as a consequence, screening successes have decreased, costs have increased, and fewer subjects are enrolled. To achieve narrowed targets, studies have been forced to be multicenter and multinational to reach a larger pool of candidates. However, this globalization faces many challenges, as, for example, in the case of precision oncology trials. These trials have a complex structure that is dependent upon a high-tech infrastructure and knowledge in a dynamic environment. Given the movement of precision clinical cancer research to regions other than Europe and the U.S., it is important to evaluate the feasibility of performing such trials in lower-middle- and low-income countries. Here we critically discuss the advantages of conducting precision oncology clinical trials in Latin America and make suggestions on how to overcome the main challenges involved. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Precision clinical trials in oncology are studies that require candidates to have tumors with specific molecular alterations, which are considered the target for the trial experimental therapy. Because many molecular alterations are rare, fewer patients are enrolled. This has led to trials being forced to be multicenter and multinational, including trials in Latin America. This article discusses the challenges and opportunities to conduct precision oncology trials in Latin America, aiming to help sponsors and investigators to solve complex issues that ultimately lead to more of such trials being run in the region, potentially benefiting more Latin American patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansInternationalityLatin AmericaMolecular Targeted TherapyMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineCancerClinical trialsGlobal oncologyPrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID30910864
PMCPMC6693712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.