ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2019
The Optimal Short Version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Diagnosing Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05614986 (Prospective Evaluation of Neurocognition in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Evaluation of Neurocognition in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Periprocedural Changes and Predictors of Improvement
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient and Caregiver Outcomes of Health System, Community-Based, and Usual Dementia Care: A Prespecified Analysis of the Dementia Care Study (D-CARE) Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Utility of a short, telephone-administered version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Trial
- A newly designed intensive caregiver education program reduces cognitive impairment, anxiety, and depression in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2019Trial
- Combined physical and cognitive training in a community aging center serving a socioeconomically vulnerable population: a feasibility study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2026Article
- An Ultra-Brief Informant Questionnaire for Case Finding of Cognitive Impairment Across Diverse Literacy: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Home-based cognitive telerehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: differential cognitive trajectories according to baseline impairment severity.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Brief Age-Normed Screening Tool for Subthreshold Psychosis Symptoms in Youth.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- A normative calculator for MoCA domain scores: proxy for Z-scores of conventional neuropsychological tests.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- PENSIEVE-AI a brief cognitive test to detect cognitive impairment across diverse literacy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Development of a Brief Cognitive Screening Tool for Predicting Postoperative Delirium in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Secondary Analysis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Article
- Role of a Urinary Biomarker in the Common Mechanism of Physical Performance and Cognitive Function.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Neuropsychiatric symptoms in early stage of Alzheimer's and non-Alzheimer's dementia, and the risk of progression to severe dementia.Age and ageing · 2021Article
- Accuracy of the Short-Form Montreal Cognitive Assessment Chinese Versions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Trajectories of subjective cognitive decline, and the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Article
- Active case finding of dementia in ambulatory care settings: a comparison of three strategies.European journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Subjective cognitive decline, anxiety symptoms, and the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Article
- Knowledge of Evidence-Based Services Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Short Form.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020Article
- Neuropsychiatric symptoms in cognitively normal older persons, and the association with Alzheimer's and non-Alzheimer's dementia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Article
- Comparative Study of Two Short-Form Versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for Screening of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in a Chinese Population.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020Article
- A 4-Item Case-Finding Tool to Detect Dementia in Older Persons.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWhile various short variants of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) have been developed, they have not been compared among each other to determine the most optimal variant for routine use. This study evaluated the comparative performance of the short variants in identifying mild cognitive impairment or dementia (MCI/dementia).
designBaseline data of a cohort study.
settingAlzheimer's Disease Centers across the United States.
participantsParticipants aged ≥50 years (n = 4606), with median age 70 (interquartile range 65-76). MEASURES: Participants completed MoCA and were evaluated for MCI/dementia. The various short variants of MoCA were compared in their performance in discriminating MCI/dementia, using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs).
resultsAll 7 short variants of MoCA had acceptable performance in discriminating MCI/dementia from normal cognition (AUC 87.7%-91.0%). However, only 2 variants by Roalf et al (2016) and Wong et al (2015) demonstrated comparable performance (AUC 88.4-88.9%) to the original MoCA (AUC 89.3%). Among the participants with higher education, only the variant by Roalf et al had similar AUC to the original MoCA. At the optimal cut-off score of <25, the original MoCA demonstrated 84.4% sensitivity and 76.4% specificity. In contrast, the short variant by Roalf et al had 87.2% sensitivity and 72.1% specificity at its optimal cut-off score of <13. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The various short variants may not share similar diagnostic performance, with many limited by ceiling effects among participants with higher education. Only the short variant by Roalf et al was comparable to the original MoCA in identifying MCI or dementia even across education subgroups. This variant is one-third the length of the original MoCA and can be completed in <5 minutes. It provides a viable alternative when it is not feasible to administer the original MoCA in clinical practice and can be especially useful in nonspecialty clinics with large volumes of patients at high risk of cognitive impairment (such as those in primary care, geriatric, and stroke prevention clinics).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.