ArticleJournal of biomechanics2019
Reproducibility and responsiveness of gait initiation in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The FeetMeSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Differential Effects of Acute and Multiple Concussions on Gait Initiation Performance.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) have significant impairments in functional mobility, including the ability to initiate gait. Three-dimensional analysis of kinetic and kinematic outcomes has become one of the most powerful tools in evaluating abnormalities in gait initiation for persons with PD. Surprisingly however, the psychometric properties of spatial and temporal measures of gait initiation for persons with PD have not been established using force-platforms. The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability of kinetic and kinematic measures of gait initiation and to identify the minimal detectable change of these measures in persons with PD during On and Off medication conditions. Sixteen participants with idiopathic PD performed a series of 3 repeated trials of gait initiation by starting from a quiet stance position on 2 AMTI OR-6 force platforms, and walking forward across the floor following a signal from the investigators. Testing was performed first in the Off medication condition, after which participants took their medication and waited 60 min before repeating the gait initiation assessments. Relative test-retest reliability was good-to-excellent for most outcome measures (range 0.417-0.960). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic variance in the majority of outcome measures when tested in distinct medication conditions (On vs. Off medication). Most outcome measures required low-to-moderate amounts of change (<50%) to indicate true change in individual participants. These results suggest that spatial and temporal measures of gait initiation using force-platforms are highly reliable and responsive to changes in performance for persons with PD, regardless of whether individuals are optimally medicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.